2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on creep-fatigue life prediction methods for low-carbon nitrogen-controlled 316 stainless steel (316FR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For polycrystalline metals, creep damage under creep-fatigue loading is caused by grain boundary cavitation that develops with the accumulation of creep strain under strain holding (e.g., Hales, 1980;Priest and Ellison, 1981;Nam, 2002), and has been macroscopically evaluated in terms of the changes in stress and creep strain under strain holding (e.g., Inoue et al, 1989;Takahashi et al, 2008;Yan et al, 2015). To numerically evaluate creep damage in structural components, it is necessary to use a constitutive model that can accurately simulate the stress-strain behavior under cyclic loading with strain holding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For polycrystalline metals, creep damage under creep-fatigue loading is caused by grain boundary cavitation that develops with the accumulation of creep strain under strain holding (e.g., Hales, 1980;Priest and Ellison, 1981;Nam, 2002), and has been macroscopically evaluated in terms of the changes in stress and creep strain under strain holding (e.g., Inoue et al, 1989;Takahashi et al, 2008;Yan et al, 2015). To numerically evaluate creep damage in structural components, it is necessary to use a constitutive model that can accurately simulate the stress-strain behavior under cyclic loading with strain holding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priest and Ellison (1981) proposed that creep damage develops when the inelastic strain-rate under strain holding is smaller than the transition rate below which the diffusion creep and grain boundary sliding become important, whereas Hales (1983) considered that the development of creep damage depends on the variations in inelastic strain in three periods under strain holding. Takahashi (1998) and Takahashi et al (2008) adopted the Priest and Ellison (1981) model and decomposed the inelastic strain-rate under strain holding into viscoplastic and creep components occurring at high and low inelastic-strain rates, respectively, and assumed that only the creep component contributes to the development of creep damage. They thus accurately predicted the creep-fatigue lives of 316 stainless steel at 550 • C and 600 • C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers proposed many methods of the creep-fatigue evaluation, such as time fraction rules or ductility exhaustion rules (1) (2) . Time fraction rules have been applied in the current design codes for high temperature reactor plants (3) (4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) are shown in Fig. 3 for testing steel 316FR [11] with a spread of total strains 1, 0.5, and 0.4% at a temperature of 550°C, and also with spreads of 1.0 and 0.5% with a temperature of 600°C. The value of β was taken as 0.7 and 0.1, and the value of q was taken as 0.4 and 0.5 for temperatures of 550 and 600°C, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of experimental data[11] for steel 316FR: b, ×) without holding at 550 and 600°C; A, e) with holding at 550 and 600°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%