2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on mass transfer behavior of extracting La(III) with EHEHPA (P507) using rectangular cross-section microchannel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of our previous experiments, the optimal experimental results can be obtained by using the Y-junction microreactor and T-junction microreactor with the dimensions of 12.5 cm × 300 μm × 100 μm and 1/16 in. × 100 cm, respectively . The details are discussed in the following sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of our previous experiments, the optimal experimental results can be obtained by using the Y-junction microreactor and T-junction microreactor with the dimensions of 12.5 cm × 300 μm × 100 μm and 1/16 in. × 100 cm, respectively . The details are discussed in the following sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hou et al studied the extraction of Pr­(III) in chloride acidic solution by using membrane dispersion microextractors, wherein the extraction efficiency reached almost 100% in 2 s at the optimal conditions. Recently, our research group also studied the extraction and separation of light rare earths (La, Ce, Pr, and Nd) in the presence of complexing agent in the Y-junction microreactor and reported considerable separation factors and mass-transfer coefficient in comparison to those of the traditional extraction process. All these published studies in the literature prove that microfluidic extraction technology is highly efficient and environmentally friendly, which has a promising prospect in the modern industry. As a late-model low-cost technology, microfluidics technology is applied to this experiment that can effectively solve high extractant consumption in the conventional solvent extraction process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The extraction‐reaction can be completed within 1.5 s using the microfluidic device with the efficiency of 98.55%. Yin and his co‐authors have separated rare‐earth elements (Ce, Pr, La) from chloride solution in the slug flow microreactor. The experimental results show that the microfluidic extractor has better mass transfer, and the volumetric mass transfer coefficient ( k L α) is several orders of magnitude than conventional reactor.…”
Section: Background and Originality Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many studies on passive microextractors have been reported. However, to date, most of these studies have focused on ordered flow microextractors such as droplet, slug, and laminar flow microextractors, , and little attention has been paid to disordered flow microextractors. , In droplet microextractors, to generate ordered droplets, the flow rate of the dispersed phase should be much lower than that of the continuous phase. As for the slug flow microextractors, the slugs are often produced at small total flow rates with appropriate flux ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, another crucial problem needs to be addressed in practice. All the above-mentioned microextractors involve cocurrent microextraction, in which the mass transfer limit is determined by the phase equilibrium. As a result, only one equilibrium stage can be achieved, resulting in a low extraction efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%