2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on molecularly imprinted nanoparticle modified microplates for pseudo-ELISA assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MIPs have gained popularity ever since Mosbach’s group, in 1993, reported their application in a pseudo-immunoassay for the determination of drugs 4 , whereby for the first time, MIPs were coined ‘antibody mimics’ 5 . Hence, MIPs have been around for some time now and they have been widely developed and applied in solid-phase extraction 6,7 , sensors 8,9 , pseudo-immunoassays 10,11 , drug delivery 12,13 and very recently for optical bioimaging 1416 . Nevertheless, despite many efforts to make MIPs become ‘ a useful general alternative to antibodies ’ 5 , they are still not very much commercialized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIPs have gained popularity ever since Mosbach’s group, in 1993, reported their application in a pseudo-immunoassay for the determination of drugs 4 , whereby for the first time, MIPs were coined ‘antibody mimics’ 5 . Hence, MIPs have been around for some time now and they have been widely developed and applied in solid-phase extraction 6,7 , sensors 8,9 , pseudo-immunoassays 10,11 , drug delivery 12,13 and very recently for optical bioimaging 1416 . Nevertheless, despite many efforts to make MIPs become ‘ a useful general alternative to antibodies ’ 5 , they are still not very much commercialized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67,68] On the other hand, the lack of reproducibility and the difficult coating of the microplates wells makes it unfeasible to be used in quantitative analyses. [46,69] In general, a reasonable number of studies employing MIPs in off-line techniques can be found (Table 1), probably because less sophisticated equipment is required. However, sample handling can amplify the experimental errors and decrease analytical frequency.…”
Section: Off-line Solid-phase Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cenci et al [46] took a closer look at the preparation and stability of the pseudo-ELISA plates. Fluorescent MIPs of acrylamide, methacrylic acid, and acryloxyethyl thiocarbamoyl Rhodamine B were prepared by precipitation polymerization.…”
Section: Pseudo-elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One good thing about MIP is that once the synthesis method is established, it can be further utilized as a versatile binding site for selectively recognizing the target molecule in multiple forms. Interestingly, the MIP has been applied to the detection of many other iron status markers, such as quantification of hepcidin by SPR and pseudo‐ELISA methods (Cenci et al, 2015; Cenci, Piotto, Bettotti, & Maria Bossi, 2018), separation and detection of Tf based on the so‐called magnetic fluorescence molecularly imprinted nanoparticles (MFMINPs) (Y. D. Zhang, Huang, Ma, Liu, & Zhang, 2018), and ferritin sensing achieved by arrays of carbon‐nanotube tips coated with nonconductive MIP and readout via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Cai et al, 2010). For better depicting the iron status in point‐of‐care testing, a dual‐functional microfluidic paper analytical device (μPAD) has been developed for Fe 3+ and ferritin analysis (Hu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Nanotechnology In Coordination With Iron Homeostasismentioning
confidence: 99%