2020
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2020.1727783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on non-Fickian behavior for solute transport through porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as inferred from Table 1, this deviation in the heterogeneous soil is much more than that in the homogeneous soil. In general, the comparison of the fitting results of this study with those of Sharma et al's (2020) study, a relatively similar work to this paper, revealed that the α values obtained in this study are in excellent agreement with the physical properties of the homogeneous and heterogeneous soils, while those obtained in Sharma et al's (2020) study are inconsistent with the physical properties of the heterogeneous soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as inferred from Table 1, this deviation in the heterogeneous soil is much more than that in the homogeneous soil. In general, the comparison of the fitting results of this study with those of Sharma et al's (2020) study, a relatively similar work to this paper, revealed that the α values obtained in this study are in excellent agreement with the physical properties of the homogeneous and heterogeneous soils, while those obtained in Sharma et al's (2020) study are inconsistent with the physical properties of the heterogeneous soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Note that the distinguish between the numerical solutions presented in this study and that presented by Sharma et al (2020), a relatively similar work to this paper, is that the present study solved numerically the one‐sided s‐FADE with a positive fractional derivative by applying an implicit finite difference method and by imposing the local and non‐local boundary conditions, while Sharma et al (2020) solved numerically a two‐sided s‐FADE by applying an explicit finite difference method and by only imposing the local boundary conditions. Furthermore, the numerical solutions presented in this work are unconditionally stable, while that presented by Sharma et al (2020) are conditionally stable.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlations are inferred between the effective mass transfer time and other parameters such as the flow rate, the capacity coefficient, the advective residence time and the experimental duration. Experiments reported in the literature involve porous media made of sand (Coats and Smith, 1964;Gaudet et al, 1977;De Smedt et al, 1986;Rambow andLennartz, 1993, Kookana et al, 1993 ;Sharma et al, 2022 ;Sutton et al, 2022), loam (van Genuchten and Wierenga, 1977; van Genuchten et al, 1977), loamy sand (Khan and Jury, 1990), clay (Jørgensen et al, 2004), stony soil (Schulin et al, 1987), glass beads (Krupp and Elrick, 1968;De Smedt and Wierenga, 1984;Berkowitz et al, 2009), field soil (Smettem, 1984, Sutton et al, 2022, loam and field soil (Selim et al, 1987), aggregate (Rao et al 1980;Seyfried and Rao, 1987;Koch and Flühler, 1993;Li et al, 1994;Nkedi-Kizza et al 1984;Brusseau et al, 1994;Bajracharya and Barry, 1997), or spherical clayey inclusions in sandy media (Tran Ngoc et al, 2020). In the aforementioned studies, porous media are either homogeneous or moderately heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, to obtain a three-dimensional (3D) tracer transport averaging equation from turbulent flow, the tracer concentration in the 3D tracer transport equation is averaged over the entire fluctuating period T, also known as the classical averaging (Reynolds averaging) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], or the Global Averaging Values (GAV) [16,17]; the quantity of tracer concentration in the equation is averaged for a whole fluctuating period T:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%