“…Conversely, the MPLs featuring broad band and long persistent duration, especially for those showing a spectral contribution extending to the UV spectral range, are privileged. For example, the melilite-type Ce 3+ -doped Ca2MgSi2O7 whose persistent band peaks at 380 nm is suitable for a TiO2 PCM that presents an absorption cut-off at 387 nm, whereas other types of PMLs like CaAl2O4:Eu 2+ ,Nd 3+ with emission peaking at ~440 nm [49,[60][61]71], SrAl2O4:Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ with ~520 nm emission [64,379], and Sr2MgSi2O7:Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ with ~465 nm emission [66,72] are unsuitable. With this logical thinking, the TiO2 is usefully associated with MPLs, as proved by the Sr4Al14O25:Eu 2+ ,Dy 3+ ,Bi 3+ @TiO2 for the MB degradation [69], BaAl2O4:Eu 2+ ,Nd 3+ @TiO2 for the benzene decomposition, Ca2MgSi2O7:Ce@TiO2 [366] and Mg3Y2Ge3O12:Bi@TiO2 [380] for the MO degradation, etc.…”