2016
DOI: 10.17577/ijertv5is010092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Physical Properties of Indira Kodo-I (Paspalum Scrobiculatum L.) Millet

Abstract: Kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.) is popularly comes in the category of coarse cereals and included in the broad category of cereals. Kodo millet is nutritionally superior to rice and wheat and presence of all the required nutrients, which make it suitable for industrial scale utilization in food stuff .It is also a good source of protein, carbohydrate and rich source of minerals, fibers, vitamins and micronutrients. Studies of engineering properties of variety Indira Kodo-I (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.) w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frictional properties like angle of repose and coefficient of friction helps the engineers in designing of storage bins, godowns etc. The mean result for the angle of repose was 27°47'± 0.21 is comparable with the angle of repose (27-32°8') reported for the finger millet, kodo millet and little millet (Shivabasappa et al, 2012;Balasubramanian, 2016;Dewendra Kumar et al, 2016) [23,5,9] . The coefficient of friction for the three surfaces namely, Glass, Aluminum and Wooden Sheets were 0.62 ± 0.0009, 0.59 ± 0.0051 and 0.6 ± 0.0063, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Frictional Propertiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The frictional properties like angle of repose and coefficient of friction helps the engineers in designing of storage bins, godowns etc. The mean result for the angle of repose was 27°47'± 0.21 is comparable with the angle of repose (27-32°8') reported for the finger millet, kodo millet and little millet (Shivabasappa et al, 2012;Balasubramanian, 2016;Dewendra Kumar et al, 2016) [23,5,9] . The coefficient of friction for the three surfaces namely, Glass, Aluminum and Wooden Sheets were 0.62 ± 0.0009, 0.59 ± 0.0051 and 0.6 ± 0.0063, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Frictional Propertiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The results obtained for bulk density, true density, angle of repose and porosity were close to the findings of (Sunil, Venkatachalapathy et al, 2016) [22] . The co-efficient of friction against the mild steel was 0.781 and these result was closer to the value obtained by (Chandan Kumar V.b 2018) [6] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Grains with higher sphericity and size, yield more head grains. From the studies by Kumar et al (2016) and Nagaraju et al (2020), kodo millet has higher sphericity and larger size than browntop millet. The findings of the current study are in acceptance with the previous reports since the head grain yield of kodo millet is comparatively higher than that of browntop millet at similar levels of polishing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%