2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-006-7103-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Collapse of Pin-Reinforced Foam Sandwich Panel Cores

Abstract: New fabrication technologies now allow for hybrid sandwich structures, known as X-core, to be manufactured. The X-core panels consist of a pin reinforced polymer foam core with carbon fiber face sheets. Carbon fiber or metallic (Titanium/Steel) pins are inserted into the foam core in the out-of-plane direction and extend from face sheet to face sheet. The through thickness three-point simply supported bending behavior of these panels is used to evaluate the collapse characteristics of the panels. Explicit expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the tensile plate shear tests provided the shear modulus data of 4.3 MPa (warp) and 7.8 MPa (weft), and thus the core shear buckling loads were determined as 1.7×10 3 N (warp) and 3.1×10 3 N (weft). In the edgewise test the failure loads were about 970 N (warp) and 1500 N (weft), less than Euler buckling and core shear buckling loads [16,17], which indicated that no such failure modes happened.…”
Section: Stress-strain Curves and Fracture Morphologies Of Mono-spacementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Besides, the tensile plate shear tests provided the shear modulus data of 4.3 MPa (warp) and 7.8 MPa (weft), and thus the core shear buckling loads were determined as 1.7×10 3 N (warp) and 3.1×10 3 N (weft). In the edgewise test the failure loads were about 970 N (warp) and 1500 N (weft), less than Euler buckling and core shear buckling loads [16,17], which indicated that no such failure modes happened.…”
Section: Stress-strain Curves and Fracture Morphologies Of Mono-spacementioning
confidence: 89%
“…5 of Cartie and Fleck (2003) and Fig. 4 of Rice et al (2006). ''Prediction 1" denotes the predictions given in Marasco et al (2006), while ''Prediction 2" denotes the predictions obtained by the current model.…”
Section: Plastic Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, with the pin volume fraction fixed, the pin diameter had negligible influence over the size range studied. Further work by Rice et al (2006) mainly concerned about the collapse mechanism of sandwich panels having Rohacell foam cores reinforced by composite pins subjected to 3-point bending. Three failure modes were considered: indentation, core shearing and face sheet failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common interfacial toughening methodology's applied for sandwich structures encompasses Z-pinning (Rice et al 2006;Cartie and Fleck 2003;Marasco et al 2006) and stitching (Potluri et al 2003;Lascoup et al 2006), refers to sewing the face and core mutually by Z-directional or through-thickness reinforcements. This method increased the compression properties of sandwich panel by more than 100% (Nanayakkara et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%