2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4984080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the interactions between two identical oscillation bubbles and a free surface in a tank

Abstract: A boundary element method based on the incompressible potential flow theory is adopted to investigate the interaction between two identical oscillating bubbles and a free surface in a tank. An axisymmetric numerical model is established, and certain numerical techniques are proposed to address coefficient matrix singularity and fluid-structure intersection. Experiments with spark-generated bubbles in a cylindrical tank recorded by a high-speed camera are conducted, and the numerical results are validated. On t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the crown, is put into question by the work of Han, Zhang & Li (2014) and Liu et al. (2017), who both used an incompressible boundary element method (BEM) to study similar configurations. Owing to the challenges that the BEM encounters in simulating the bubble after it breaks into a toroid, the former authors simply removed the toroidal bubble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the crown, is put into question by the work of Han, Zhang & Li (2014) and Liu et al. (2017), who both used an incompressible boundary element method (BEM) to study similar configurations. Owing to the challenges that the BEM encounters in simulating the bubble after it breaks into a toroid, the former authors simply removed the toroidal bubble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the subject of crown formation, they write: ‘when the toroidal bubble starts to rebound, the pushing effect from the rebounding bubble, similar to the effect from the initial expanding bubble, tends to induce the upward deformation of the free surface again, which is the cause of the secondary spike.’ They add: ‘since [Liu et al. (2017)] ignored the compressibility of the water, acoustic emissions were absent in their simulation. Therefore, we argue that the acoustic emissions are not important in the formation of the crown spike.’ Beyond these statements, however, they did not provide any quantitative evidence of the role of compressibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this model, Li et al [27,28] applied the BEM to study bubble behavior near a free surface and a rigid body. Zhang et al [29][30][31][32] investigated bubble dynamics near different boundaries with the BEM, and the obtained numerical results were compared with experimental data to verify the validity of the computational method. The BEM is effective to simulate bubble dynamics; however, additional numerical techniques should be used with the BEM model to simulate a process of jet formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson et al (2004) improved the model that can accurately capture the evolution of the free surface and the bubble motion. Liu et al (2017) investigated the interaction between two identical oscillating bubbles and a free surface in a confined domain. Three-dimensional configurations were also considered in Han et al (2014); Li and Ni (2016); Wang and Khoo (2004); .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%