2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05058c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the performance of a MOF-808-based photocatalyst prepared by a microwave-assisted method for the degradation of antibiotics

Abstract: In this paper, a simple method was used to rapidly prepare MOF-808 with a large specific surface area and high stability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the drastically different local coordination motifs of the Zr sites in the four catalysts, only small differences in the electronic state of Zr were detected by XPS (Figure ). The C 1s-corrected Zr 3d 3/2 and 3d 5/2 binding energies (BEs) for MOF-808 were 184.8 and 182.4 eV, respectively, within the range of values (184.8–185.2 and 182.4–182.8 eV) reported in the literature. , These Zr 3d BEs were nearly identical at 185.3(±0.1) and 183.1(±0.1) eV for Zr-Beta and ZrO 2 /SiO 2 , and 185.1 and 182.7 eV for Zr-PhyA, in line with the literature. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Despite the drastically different local coordination motifs of the Zr sites in the four catalysts, only small differences in the electronic state of Zr were detected by XPS (Figure ). The C 1s-corrected Zr 3d 3/2 and 3d 5/2 binding energies (BEs) for MOF-808 were 184.8 and 182.4 eV, respectively, within the range of values (184.8–185.2 and 182.4–182.8 eV) reported in the literature. , These Zr 3d BEs were nearly identical at 185.3(±0.1) and 183.1(±0.1) eV for Zr-Beta and ZrO 2 /SiO 2 , and 185.1 and 182.7 eV for Zr-PhyA, in line with the literature. ,, …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…By modifying linkers employing functional groups, highly porous structures with remarkable surface areas could be obtained with tuned surface structures [ 67 ]. MOFs were first discovered in the mid-1990′s by Omar Yaghi, and the invention of novel MOFs promised long-lived influence in the areas of chemistry, physics, biology, and the material sciences, particularly used extensively in photocatalysis due to their high surface area, adjustable porosity and pore volume [ 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Thus, MOFs promise to be highly-effective materials for the photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics in a solution [ 66 , 70 ].…”
Section: Common Photocatalytic Materials For Antibiotic Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 For MOF-808 and AgI, the value of n was divided into 4 and 1. 42,43 From Fig. 6a and b, the optical band gaps of MOF-808 and AgI were obtained as 4.01 eV and 2.72 eV by calculating the tangent intercept.…”
Section: Optical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%