2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on weakly nonlinear motions of ship advancing in waves and influences of steady ship wave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, this treatment cannot accurately reflect the interaction between the steady flow and the unsteady flow in the body surface boundary condition. On the other hand, as explained in [9], the larger contribution of the steady velocity potential in both the body surface and free surface boundary conditions at low frequencies also leads to relatively larger deviations, but these effects are not fully considered in the method using DB flow. Therefore, the coupling effects between the nonlinear steady flow and the unsteady flow, which are reflected in both the free surface boundary condition and the m j terms in the body surface boundary condition, are quite important for the prediction of hydrodynamic coefficients, especially at low frequencies.…”
Section: Results Of the Diffraction Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, this treatment cannot accurately reflect the interaction between the steady flow and the unsteady flow in the body surface boundary condition. On the other hand, as explained in [9], the larger contribution of the steady velocity potential in both the body surface and free surface boundary conditions at low frequencies also leads to relatively larger deviations, but these effects are not fully considered in the method using DB flow. Therefore, the coupling effects between the nonlinear steady flow and the unsteady flow, which are reflected in both the free surface boundary condition and the m j terms in the body surface boundary condition, are quite important for the prediction of hydrodynamic coefficients, especially at low frequencies.…”
Section: Results Of the Diffraction Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their studies, the mean second-order wave force was evaluated by Rankine panel method using NK or DB linearization, which was then treated as the input force in the equations for predicting maneuvering behavior. However, these two linearization methods, as described in [4], can be justified in the case of a slender ship, but they are not suitable for blunt bodies or ships moving at high speeds [9]. In light of the limitations of the NK and DB linearizations, works addressing ship hydrodynamics by using steady wave-making flow as basic flow for linearization were carried out; e.g., Gao and Zou [10] computed the linear steady wave-making flow beforehand and then applied the results to solve the diffraction and radiation problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Untuk memperkirakan kinerja gerak crane vessel, variasi sea state diberikan dalam analisis penelitian seperti yang dilakukan oleh (X. Chen et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019). Dalam kode (Det Norske Veritas, 2014), operasi pengangkatan stuktur dalam laut bergelombang oleh crane vessel dilakukan tidak lebih dari tinggi gelombang signifikan sebesar 2.0 m, sehingga kegiatan decommissioning offshore structure dilakukan pada kondisi sea state yang relatif kecil.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Nakos [8] carried out the numerical prediction of ship heave and pitch motion responses via high-order Rankine source method in the paper [9]. In the time domain, Chen et al [10] adopted three-dimensional Rankine source function to obtain the hydrodynamic problems and motions of ship in regular waves. However, radiation condition is hard to achieve in short wavelengths for Rankine source method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%