2013
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2013.2278663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying Light-Induced Degradation by Lifetime Decay Analysis: Excellent Fit to Solution of Simple Second-Order Rate Equation

Abstract: Abstract-Twenty different boron-doped Czochralski silicon materials have been analyzed for light induced degradation. The carrier lifetime degradation was monitored by an automated quasi steady state photoconductance setup with an externally controlled bias lamp for in-situ illumination between measurements. Logarithmic plots of the time resolved lifetime decays clearly displayed the previously reported rapid and slow decays, but a satisfactory fit to a single exponential function could not be achieved. We fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the accelerated defect formation rate with increasing illumination intensity may imply a strong dependence upon the total hole concentration during the annealing process, which in these experiments is estimated to vary between 1.0 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 2.1 × 10 17 photons/cm 2 /s to 5.2 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 1.68 × 10 19 photons/cm 2 /s. This would agree with the previous results presented in which holes are required for the degradation reaction , as well as with the observation of Rougieux et al of an excess carrier dependent defect formation rate in compensated n‐type silicon. It would also agree with speculation by Macdonald et al that the rate of defect formation may possess a dependence on excess hole density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the accelerated defect formation rate with increasing illumination intensity may imply a strong dependence upon the total hole concentration during the annealing process, which in these experiments is estimated to vary between 1.0 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 2.1 × 10 17 photons/cm 2 /s to 5.2 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 1.68 × 10 19 photons/cm 2 /s. This would agree with the previous results presented in which holes are required for the degradation reaction , as well as with the observation of Rougieux et al of an excess carrier dependent defect formation rate in compensated n‐type silicon. It would also agree with speculation by Macdonald et al that the rate of defect formation may possess a dependence on excess hole density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A possible explanation is that in this work the illumination intensities used here are high enough to result in a significant increase in the majority carrier concentration which would not have occurred in the previous work. The saturated defect concentration appeared to be independent of the hole concentration during the process, supporting the conclusions of several in the literature that this parameter depends upon p 0 . In contrast, the accelerated defect formation rate with increasing illumination intensity may imply a strong dependence upon the total hole concentration during the annealing process, which in these experiments is estimated to vary between 1.0 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 2.1 × 10 17 photons/cm 2 /s to 5.2 × 10 16 cm –3 for an illumination intensity of 1.68 × 10 19 photons/cm 2 /s.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the one hand, a quadratic dependence of the defect formation rate on the equilibrium hole concentration (p 0 ) was observed [24,27,28,94,128]. On the other hand, a dependence of the defect formation rate on the illumination intensity was also observed for low illumination intensities, up to approximately 0.01 suns, at which the reaction rate saturated [8,129].…”
Section: Role Of Defect Formationmentioning
confidence: 91%