2018
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.035089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the differential efficacy of postsymptom antitoxin treatment in type A versus type B botulism using a rabbit spirometry model

Abstract: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotypes A, B and E are responsible for most cases of human botulism. The only approved therapy for botulism is antitoxin treatment administered to patients after symptom onset. However, a recent meta-analysis of antitoxin efficacy in human botulism cases over the past century concluded that a statistically significant reduction in mortality is associated with the use of type E and type A antitoxin, but not with type B antitoxin. Animal models could be highly valuable in studying p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplicity of using a PICC-based prolonged continuous infusion via the marginal ear vein, together with the power of daily spirometry in unrestrained rabbits, can serve as a valuable tool in various research fields, for example, when respiration monitoring is needed. Recently, we established a rabbit spirometry model to monitor respiration and control the treatment timing following exposure to botulinum toxins (BoNTs), the most poisonous substances known in nature ( Diamant et al, 2018 ; Torgeman et al, 2018 ). Spirometry was shown in these studies to serve as an accurate, quantitative, and objective means to detect early symptoms of botulism in rabbits, and deviation from the normal minute volume (Mv) following exposure to BoNT was found to be the earliest symptom to be measured among other spirometry-related parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The simplicity of using a PICC-based prolonged continuous infusion via the marginal ear vein, together with the power of daily spirometry in unrestrained rabbits, can serve as a valuable tool in various research fields, for example, when respiration monitoring is needed. Recently, we established a rabbit spirometry model to monitor respiration and control the treatment timing following exposure to botulinum toxins (BoNTs), the most poisonous substances known in nature ( Diamant et al, 2018 ; Torgeman et al, 2018 ). Spirometry was shown in these studies to serve as an accurate, quantitative, and objective means to detect early symptoms of botulism in rabbits, and deviation from the normal minute volume (Mv) following exposure to BoNT was found to be the earliest symptom to be measured among other spirometry-related parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spirometry was shown in these studies to serve as an accurate, quantitative, and objective means to detect early symptoms of botulism in rabbits, and deviation from the normal minute volume (Mv) following exposure to BoNT was found to be the earliest symptom to be measured among other spirometry-related parameters. Accurate quantification of the postintoxication Mv decline by a spirometer qualified the Mv symptom to become a reliable clinical symptom of botulism ( Diamant et al, 2018 ; Torgeman et al, 2018 ). Currently, we are involved in an effort to test a small molecule inhibitor (SMI) against BoNT by continuous infusion using our PICC-based rabbit model via the marginal ear vein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard therapy for botulism in adults, including in cases of BoNT/E intoxications, involves treatment with antitoxin preparations [12, 13] derived from hyperimmune horses (A human antitoxin preparation is also available for infant botulism cases involving BoNT/A or BoNT/B [14]). The potencies of both the pharmaceutical antitoxin and the toxicity of BoNT/E preparations intended for horse immunization, are determined in vivo by the pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) [15] and by the mouse bioassay (MBA) [16], respectively. However, these in vivo assays require a large number of laboratory animals, and hence development of alternative in vitro methods to measure activity of BoNT/E and concentration of neutralizing antibodies is imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%