2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the highly bent spectra of FR II-type radio galaxies with the KDA EXT model

Abstract: Context. The Kaiser, Dennett-Thorpe & Alexander (KDA) (1997) EXT model, that is, the extension of the KDA model of FR(Faranoff & Riley)II−type source evolution, is applied and confronted with the observational data for selected FR II−type radio sources with significantly aged radio spectra. Aims. A sample of FR II−type radio galaxies with radio spectra strongly bent at their highest frequencies is used for testing the usefulness of the KDA EXT model. Methods. The dynamical evolution of FR II−type sources predi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This χ 2 value, although formally higher, is in fact slightly better for the actual model fit due to the fact that in this new research, the general (not reduced χ 2 , formerly giving the slightly lowered values, as in Kuligowska ) χ 2 test ranks were calculated (cf. also Kuligowska ()). Moreover, in the case of 3C 184, both the KDA model fits (derived with DYNAGE and Monte Carlo methods) clearly reproduce observational data for this source with less accuracy than the also‐published KDA EXT fit (Kuligowska (), section 4.3.1).…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This χ 2 value, although formally higher, is in fact slightly better for the actual model fit due to the fact that in this new research, the general (not reduced χ 2 , formerly giving the slightly lowered values, as in Kuligowska ) χ 2 test ranks were calculated (cf. also Kuligowska ()). Moreover, in the case of 3C 184, both the KDA model fits (derived with DYNAGE and Monte Carlo methods) clearly reproduce observational data for this source with less accuracy than the also‐published KDA EXT fit (Kuligowska (), section 4.3.1).…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%