2001
DOI: 10.1002/cc.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying transfer students: Designs and methodological challenges

Abstract: Each year, thousands of students transfer from a community college to a four-year college or university. Because of the large number of students involved in this process, many individuals and organizations-including administrators, researchers, faculty members, and policymakers-are interested in the progress and academic achievement of these students. A substantial amount of information, usually collected by institutions for purposes other than research, is available to provide the basic facts about the progre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These students are often faced with challenges that may hinder their ability to academically succeed. Most research on student transfer has observed former community college students and how they perform academically at their new institution (Kozeracki, 2001). The process of transferring from a two-year to a four-year institution is known as vertical transfer, whereas transferring from one four-year institution to another is called horizontal transfer (McCormick & Carroll, 1997).…”
Section: Transfer Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These students are often faced with challenges that may hinder their ability to academically succeed. Most research on student transfer has observed former community college students and how they perform academically at their new institution (Kozeracki, 2001). The process of transferring from a two-year to a four-year institution is known as vertical transfer, whereas transferring from one four-year institution to another is called horizontal transfer (McCormick & Carroll, 1997).…”
Section: Transfer Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, research on transfer students is available, and ranges from discussions about the best rubric for defining and measuring transfer rates (Bradburn and Hurst, 2001) to more in-depth analyses of such issues as student satisfaction, academic performance, and patterns in the transfer process (Kozeracki, 2001;Townsend, 2001). Recent studies estimate that although the overall transfer rate is currently somewhere between 20 and 25 percent (Bryant, 2001), disparities in transfer rates persist across racial and ethnic groups, even among students most likely to transfer (Wassmer, Moore, and Shulock, 2003).…”
Section: The Transfer Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a substantial amount of information to provide institutions with the basic facts about the progress of transfer students (Kozeracki, 2001), data on particular interventions that can affect transfer student success and retention are less readily available. Many students characterize the transfer transition as a chaotic and confusing time (Chin-Newman & Shaw, 2013).…”
Section: Context and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a substantial amount of information to provide institutions with the basic facts about the progress of transfer students, what is less readily available are data that examine the factors that affect student success and that explore the effectiveness of two-year community colleges in preparing students to transfer (Kozeracki, 2001). Kates (2010) found that institutions need to focus greater attention on pedagogy and practice to address academic differences between a two-year community college and a four-year college or university.…”
Section: Expectation Differences Between a Two-year And A Four-year Imentioning
confidence: 99%