2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-020-01062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-10–16 accuracy GNSS frequency transfer with IPPP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, primary microwave clocks are connected via satellites [36] in the microwave domain by the existing GNSS infrastructure [122] or dedicated two-way time and frequency transfer (TWTFT) links [123][124][125]. Demonstrated frequency transfer uncertainties of existing microwave links (MWLs) reach into the 10 −16 range after averaging times of days [122,126] and into the 10 −17 range after averaging times of weeks with integer ambiguity resolution [122], and demonstrated time transfer uncertainties lie in the nanosecond region [125].…”
Section: Free Space-time and Frequency Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, primary microwave clocks are connected via satellites [36] in the microwave domain by the existing GNSS infrastructure [122] or dedicated two-way time and frequency transfer (TWTFT) links [123][124][125]. Demonstrated frequency transfer uncertainties of existing microwave links (MWLs) reach into the 10 −16 range after averaging times of days [122,126] and into the 10 −17 range after averaging times of weeks with integer ambiguity resolution [122], and demonstrated time transfer uncertainties lie in the nanosecond region [125].…”
Section: Free Space-time and Frequency Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, primary microwave clocks are connected via satellites [36] in the microwave domain by the existing GNSS infrastructure [122] or dedicated two-way time and frequency transfer (TWTFT) links [123][124][125]. Demonstrated frequency transfer uncertainties of existing microwave links (MWLs) reach into the 10 −16 range after averaging times of days [122,126] and into the 10 −17 range after averaging times of weeks with integer ambiguity resolution [122], and demonstrated time transfer uncertainties lie in the nanosecond region [125]. A new generation of MWL equipment is under development [21,127], which reaches in laboratory tests timing instabilities of < 100 fs for averaging times τ = 10 s to 2000 s [21], which is equivalent to fractional frequency transfer uncertainties of < 5 × 10 −17 at 2000 s. Similar performances are achieved in the optical domain by Time Transfer by Laser Link (T2L2) [128] and the European Laser Timing (ELT) experiment [129] employing time-ofarrival measurements of laser pulses.…”
Section: Free Space-time and Frequency Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, primary microwave clocks are connected via satellites [38] in the microwave domain by the existing GNSS infrastructure [124] or dedicated two-way time and frequency transfer (TWTFT) links [125][126][127]. Demonstrated frequency transfer uncertainties of existing microwave links (MWLs) reach into the 10 -16 range after averaging times of days [124,128] and into the 10 -17 range after averaging times of weeks with integer ambiguity resolution [124], and demonstrated time transfer uncertainties lie in the nanosecond region [127].…”
Section: Free-space Time and Frequency Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires careful consideration of various errors and accurate corrections to achieve global high precision time transfer [5]. The optical fiber time comparison link also has considerable high precision, but it also has high maintenance cost compared with the PPP method, and the construction is subject to various restrictions [6]. The PPP time transfer method has been widely used in international time transfer to provide high precision at low economic cost [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%