2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad2a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-3 mm, near-200 ps TOF/DOI-PET imaging with monolithic scintillator detectors in a 70 cm diameter tomographic setup

Abstract: Recently, a monolithic scintillator detector for time-of-flight (TOF)/depth-of-interaction (DOI) positron emission tomography (PET) was developed. It has a detector spatial resolution of ~1.7 mm full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM), a coincidence resolving time (CRT) of ~215 ps FWHM, and ~4.7 mm FWHM DOI resolution. Here, we demonstrate, for the first time, the imaging performance of this detector in a 70 cm diameter PET geometry. We built a tomographic setup representative of a whole-body clinical scanner, compr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the readout electronics and position estimation algorithms are more complicated and require very careful calibration compared to PET detectors based on scintillator arrays, which typically use simple center of gravity algorithms to estimate the gamma photon interaction position (Joung et al 2002, Wang et al 2011 and Du et al 2016). Furthermore, the resolution obtained from PET detectors based on thick monolithic scintillators are not in general as good as these obtained from PET detectors based on scintillator arrays (Borghi et al 2018 and Du et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, the readout electronics and position estimation algorithms are more complicated and require very careful calibration compared to PET detectors based on scintillator arrays, which typically use simple center of gravity algorithms to estimate the gamma photon interaction position (Joung et al 2002, Wang et al 2011 and Du et al 2016). Furthermore, the resolution obtained from PET detectors based on thick monolithic scintillators are not in general as good as these obtained from PET detectors based on scintillator arrays (Borghi et al 2018 and Du et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The relevant signal conditioning and processing printed circuit board (PCB) is placed beneath the tile. Measurements and prototypes of PET based on the DPC series have been widely investigated by many research groups in recent years [135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144].…”
Section: Silicon Photomultipliers (Sipms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution in the system level was ~2.9 mm at the center of the FoV by employing a 2D FBP method. By using the DOI information, the system had an almost uniform distribution of spatial resolution from the center of the FoV up to a radial distance of 25 cm, where the radial spatial resolution was measured to be ~3.3 mm FWHM and the tangential spatial resolution was ~4.7 mm FWHM [143]. Table 5 shows a summary of the application of the DPC series to different types of PET detectors and Table 6 summarizes some applications of DPC dSiPMs for PET systems.…”
Section: Silicon Photomultipliers (Sipms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2884320 the brain or female breast [4]- [6]. Recently, the advantages of DOI information have also been experimentally validated for a clinical case with a 70 cm diameter tomographic setup [7]. Furthermore, DOI is expected to also improve the performance of long-axial field-of-view PET systems (Total Body PET) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%