2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927609093623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-micron X-ray Computed Tomography for Non-Destructive 3D Visualization and Analysis

Abstract: Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2009 in Richmond, Virginia, USA, July 26 – July 30, 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been increasing application of this technique for microstructure characterization of fuel cell electrodes using nano X-ray computed tomography (nano-XCT) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and dual beam focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) [4,5,8,9,[29][30][31][32][33][34]. Nano-XCT is a nondestructive technique used to characterize the fuel cell electrodes, semiconductors, rock samples, biological samples, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been increasing application of this technique for microstructure characterization of fuel cell electrodes using nano X-ray computed tomography (nano-XCT) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and dual beam focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) [4,5,8,9,[29][30][31][32][33][34]. Nano-XCT is a nondestructive technique used to characterize the fuel cell electrodes, semiconductors, rock samples, biological samples, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, a large a-Si flat-panel detector combined with a relatively thick scintillator screen is used to obtain a high dynamic range. Alternatively, X-ray optics can be used in combination with a high-flux source to achieve very high spatial resolution Gelb et al, 2009). …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crucial prerequisite for meaningful comparisons between model and measurement is that both are conducted on representative sample volumes. Sample sizes ranging from sub‐micrometers to a few centimeters are commonly used for XRCT (Cnudde & Boone, 2013; da Silva, 2018; Gelb et al., 2009; Landis & Keane, 2010; Zubair, 2012). Larger samples may be more representative of the investigated rock, but suffer from lower spatial resolution (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the method has been ascribed the ability to capture pores and pore Figure 1. Sample size (diameter of the cylindrical core) versus resolution for X-ray computed micro-tomography (XRCT) and magnetic pore fabric (MPF) methods (XRCT modified from Cnudde & Boone, 2013;Cnudde et al, 2011;Gelb et al, 2009;Zubair, 2012). The MPF resolution is 10-20 nm for sample sizes ranging from 6 to 25.4 mm diameter (Almqvist et al, 2011;Esteban et al, 2006;Humbert et al, 2012;Parés et al, 2016;Robion et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%