1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01762550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcanonical curves and complete intersections in projective 3-space

Abstract: Un classico teorema di G. Gherardelli afferma che una curvaC P 3 è intersezionè completa se e soltanto se è proiettivamente normale e sottocanonica. Qui si prova che, seC e a- sottocanonica ed inoltre le superficie di grado 1 + (a/2) (a pari) ovvero (a + l)/2 o (a + 3)/2 o (a + 5)/2 (a dispari) tagliano suC serie complete, alloraC è intersezione completa. Si determina inoltre un bound d funzione di a tale che, seC è a-sottocanonica e di grado dles d, alloraC è intersezione completa se e soltanto se le superfic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also we would know the geometry of the variety of sextics which have some indecomposable ACM bundles with given Chern classes (somehow an analogue of Noether-Lefschetz loci for surfaces in P 3 ). We finally observe that several numerical refinements of the main result, in the spirit of [8], are immediate using our main theorem and theorem 3.8 of [19]. For instance one gets: …”
Section: Example 16 It Is Not Hard To Find Examples Of Smooth Irredmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Also we would know the geometry of the variety of sextics which have some indecomposable ACM bundles with given Chern classes (somehow an analogue of Noether-Lefschetz loci for surfaces in P 3 ). We finally observe that several numerical refinements of the main result, in the spirit of [8], are immediate using our main theorem and theorem 3.8 of [19]. For instance one gets: …”
Section: Example 16 It Is Not Hard To Find Examples Of Smooth Irredmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…First of all put: c = c 2 . By [CV1], Th. 1.6 see n.l, 6), the three nonvanishing groups must correspond to n = -1, 0, 1 therefore a -2 > -2 and a > 0 (see n.l, 6).…”
Section: Where T = 3c 2 -S + H°(f(l)) and H°(f(l))mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proof. By [CV1], Prop. 15 (see n.l, 6), the cohomology is not 0 at n = -1 and at n = 0 (to avoid a nullcorrelation bundle, with only one non vanishing group).…”
Section: Where T = 3c 2 -S + H°(f(l)) and H°(f(l))mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However on G(1, 2) and G (1,3) there are notions of regularity (which implies the G-regularity) with finite conditions: the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity on G(1, 2) ∼ = P 2 and the Qregularity on G(1, 3) ∼ = Q 4 (see [3]). In this paper we consider G (1,4) and we give a notion of regularity with only a finite number of vanishing conditions. Next we show that the L-regularity implies the G-regularity and we prove the analogs of the classical properties on P n+1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%