2022
DOI: 10.1002/da.23261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcortical shape in pediatric and adult obsessive‐compulsive disorder

Abstract: Background Obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) implicates alterations in cortico‐striato‐thalamo‐cortical and fronto‐limbic circuits. Building on prior structural findings, this is the largest study to date examining subcortical surface morphometry in OCD. Methods Structural magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 200 participants across development (5–55 years): 28 youth and 75 adults with OCD and 27 psychiatrically healthy youth and 70 adults. General linear models were used to assess group diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both FSL‐FIRST and FreeSurfer were originally developed mainly for adult brain image analyses, both software have also been used in paediatric neuroimaging. There are multiple recent studies using both FSL‐FIRST (Sandman et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2022) and FreeSurfer (Barch, Harms, et al, 2019; Barch, Tillman, et al, 2019; Grohs et al, 2021; Roediger et al, 2021) as a tool for paediatric volumetric subcortical brain segmentation. Majority of these studies did not use manual segmentation as a control for segmentation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both FSL‐FIRST and FreeSurfer were originally developed mainly for adult brain image analyses, both software have also been used in paediatric neuroimaging. There are multiple recent studies using both FSL‐FIRST (Sandman et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2022) and FreeSurfer (Barch, Harms, et al, 2019; Barch, Tillman, et al, 2019; Grohs et al, 2021; Roediger et al, 2021) as a tool for paediatric volumetric subcortical brain segmentation. Majority of these studies did not use manual segmentation as a control for segmentation accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, shape analyses localizes subregional morphometric differences using Bayesian models to estimate surface deformation. While various potential factors such as alterations in myelin, vasculature, and neuronal pruning contribute to localized shape variation [Serbruyns et al, 2015], a growing body of evidence suggests that subregional specificity offers additional insight into pathological brain alterations that conventional volumetric measurements cannot capture [Wang et al, 2022].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%