2016
DOI: 10.1088/0169-5983/48/6/061409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcritical transition scenarios via linear and nonlinear localized optimal perturbations in plane Poiseuille flow

Abstract: transition path similar to the oblique transition scenario, with slightly oscillating streaks which saturate and eventually experience secondary instability. On the other hand, the nonlinear OP rapidly forms large-amplitude bent streaks and skips the phases of streak saturation, providing a contemporary growth of all of the velocity components due to strong nonlinear coupling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the latter study was able to reduce T down to ≈ 16 D/U before finding any significant structural change in the NLOP. There is also further indirect evidence for this robustness to the choice T in that similar optimals are reported across a variety of flows: in plane Couette flow (Cherubini & De Palma 2013, 2014a; the Blasius boundary layer (Cherubini et al 2010(Cherubini et al , 2011(Cherubini et al , 2012; the asymptotic suction boundary layer (Cherubini et al 2015) and plane Poiseuille flow (Farano et al 2015(Farano et al , 2016). If T is too small, transients can obscure the situation (Rabin et al 2012) or new optimals become preferred (Pringle et al 2015, Farano 2015.…”
Section: Switching Basins Of Attraction: Minimal Seeds For Transitionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the latter study was able to reduce T down to ≈ 16 D/U before finding any significant structural change in the NLOP. There is also further indirect evidence for this robustness to the choice T in that similar optimals are reported across a variety of flows: in plane Couette flow (Cherubini & De Palma 2013, 2014a; the Blasius boundary layer (Cherubini et al 2010(Cherubini et al , 2011(Cherubini et al , 2012; the asymptotic suction boundary layer (Cherubini et al 2015) and plane Poiseuille flow (Farano et al 2015(Farano et al , 2016). If T is too small, transients can obscure the situation (Rabin et al 2012) or new optimals become preferred (Pringle et al 2015, Farano 2015.…”
Section: Switching Basins Of Attraction: Minimal Seeds For Transitionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…) Other strategies have been adopted -e.g. a relaxation approach (Monokrousos et al 2011, Duguet et al 2013), a conjugate gradient method (Cherubini et al 2010, Cherubini & De Palma 2013, Juniper 2011a) and a gradient rotation method (Farano et al 2016(Farano et al , 2017. Evidence for which approach is best is anecdotal and probably varies with the situation.…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that the full comparison of the energy gain between the theory and experiment would require to measure also the wall-normal component. Nonlinear transient growth concepts described in (Kerswell et al 2014;Duguet et al 2013;Farano et al 2016) can give further insight on the dynamics of transient states. These theories are based on fully nonlinear Navier-Stokes equations and provide the nonlinear optimal perturbation (NLOP) (typically in the sense of the minimal energy difference from the laminar flow) that can lead to turbulence.…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Transient Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the optimization formulation offers much more flexibility than simply computing the optimal perturbation in the 2 sense. Indeed, one can choose the objective function J (x) and the associated constraints according to the specific problem he/she aims to solve, see for instance [28,29,23] for optimization based on the 1 norm of the perturabtion.…”
Section: Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%