2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-020-02536-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcritical Water for the Extraction and Hydrolysis of Protein and Other Fractions in Biorefineries from Agro-food Wastes and Algae: a Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, in comparison with conventional alkali or enzymatic hydrolysis, SW provides comparable or higher yields in shorter times. In a very recent contribution, Álvarez-Viñas et al (2021) reviewed the most important features in the SWE/hydrolysis of proteins, the different modes of operation, and analyzed the effect of process conditions on the product properties [22]. The authors highlighted the necessity of establishing optimal conditions as a compromised solution for processing proteins derived from agro-food wastes and algal biomass, suggesting that could be desirable in the stage wise operation to sequentially obtain high-valued fractions.…”
Section: Subcritical Water Extraction (Swe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, in comparison with conventional alkali or enzymatic hydrolysis, SW provides comparable or higher yields in shorter times. In a very recent contribution, Álvarez-Viñas et al (2021) reviewed the most important features in the SWE/hydrolysis of proteins, the different modes of operation, and analyzed the effect of process conditions on the product properties [22]. The authors highlighted the necessity of establishing optimal conditions as a compromised solution for processing proteins derived from agro-food wastes and algal biomass, suggesting that could be desirable in the stage wise operation to sequentially obtain high-valued fractions.…”
Section: Subcritical Water Extraction (Swe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical methods of protein extraction include ultrasound-assisted, microwave-assisted, hydrothermal, , supercritical fluid, mechanical fractionation, and ultrafine milling with electrostatic separation as the most conventional method for lignocellulosic materials . Contreras et al reviewed physical protein extraction methods from agricultural and food residues based on dry and nondry extraction conditions and use of different protein extraction/recovery methods .…”
Section: Upstream Nitrogen Recovery From Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein yields, enzymes used, and optimized extraction parameters were reviewed by Contreras et al and Nadar et al A combination of enzyme-assisted extraction with physical extraction often increases extraction efficiency (and economic viability) depending on cell wall rigidity, chemical composition, protein structure, and storage conditions . Enzyme-assisted processes can be performed under mild conditions (pH of 6–8 and temperatures of 40–60 °C) without the presence of toxic chemicals and to the desired degree of hydrolysis …”
Section: Upstream Nitrogen Recovery From Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integration of this process in a biorefinery process would allow the valorization of the exhausted solids [ 27 ]. Subcritical water processing has been proposed as a green technique suitable for the extraction of protein, polysaccharides and phenolics from vegetal and algal biomass [ 28 ]. Furthermore, intensification with microwave heating has proved successful for the rapid extraction of carrageenan and phenolic compounds from Mastocarpus stellatus [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%