2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous treprostinil in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Practical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eighteen patients (8%) discontinued treprostinil because of injection site pain (compared with one receiving placebo); local infusion site pain was considered dose-limiting and resulted in a low dose of treprostinil achieved by week 12 in most patients. Subsequent studies have shown that these local adverse events considered dose-limiting in this pivotal trial (of pooled data) can be transient and are not dose-related, suggesting that the trial resulted in less efficacy than would have been expected if higher doses were used (Mathier et al, 2010). Indeed, the protocols of the two pivotal studies did not allow dosing above 22.5 ng ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 over the 12-week period; compared with later trials that evaluated doses greater than 40 ng ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 (Lang et al, 2006), patients in these trials were exposed to low doses of drug.…”
Section: B Clinical Studies (Subcutaneous Infusion)mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Eighteen patients (8%) discontinued treprostinil because of injection site pain (compared with one receiving placebo); local infusion site pain was considered dose-limiting and resulted in a low dose of treprostinil achieved by week 12 in most patients. Subsequent studies have shown that these local adverse events considered dose-limiting in this pivotal trial (of pooled data) can be transient and are not dose-related, suggesting that the trial resulted in less efficacy than would have been expected if higher doses were used (Mathier et al, 2010). Indeed, the protocols of the two pivotal studies did not allow dosing above 22.5 ng ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 over the 12-week period; compared with later trials that evaluated doses greater than 40 ng ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ min Ϫ1 (Lang et al, 2006), patients in these trials were exposed to low doses of drug.…”
Section: B Clinical Studies (Subcutaneous Infusion)mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Within the first 6 months, 50% of the patients who discontinued due to site pain had already stopped treatment and had a comparable dropout rate to our cohort after 16 weeks of treatment [6] . Different pain treatments, including local/topical options and systemic analgesics, are available and may be used for different intensities of infusion site pain [10] . In our cohort, mostly non-opioid an- a Four subjects were WHO-FC II at baseline and remained WHO-FC II at week 16, b Three subjects had a baseline walk greater than 400 m, all increased by more than 30 m at week 16, c Two subjects had a TAPSE of greater than 2 cm at baseline and retained a value of greater than 2 cm at week 16. algesics were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treprostinil dose rate has also been found to be an independent prognostic on-treatment predictor of survival in a retrospective analysis of 811 patients treated with SC treprostinil [9] . A slow dose titration is therefore a potential cause of sub-therapeutic dosages [10] , which may provoke premature discontinuation of treatment. A thorough medical management of SC treprostinil therapy, including multidisciplinary patient support and proactive infusion site pain management, is necessary to achieve a clinically effective dosing regimen [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Typically this is managed with the use of a preferred site, frequent site changes, oral and topical analgesics, and rapid increases in dosage to goal. 11 Levy et al reported on 8 children (ages 1.5 to 10 years, median 4 years) who were started on SCTre after failure of oral medications. 12 A total of 5/8 patients had congenital heart defects and 3 had idiopathic PAH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%