2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.20.9.097002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subdiffusion reflectance spectroscopy to measure tissue ultrastructure and microvasculature: model and inverse algorithm

Abstract: Abstract. Reflectance measurements acquired from within the subdiffusion regime (i.e., lengthscales smaller than a transport mean free path) retain much of the original information about the shape of the scattering phase function. Given this sensitivity, many models of subdiffusion regime light propagation have focused on parametrizing the optical signal through various optical and empirical parameters. We argue, however, that a more useful and universal way to characterize such measurements is to focus instea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fraction of hemoglobin saturated with oxygen was extracted from the diffuse backscattering spectrum using methods described in other publications. 26,27 Measurements acquired manually have a lower percentage of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin, and despite the manual measurements in Fig. 9(a) appearing very similar, the interpatient variance is significantly higher (P < 0.05) indicating a level of inconsistency from patient-to-patient.…”
Section: Automated In Vivo Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fraction of hemoglobin saturated with oxygen was extracted from the diffuse backscattering spectrum using methods described in other publications. 26,27 Measurements acquired manually have a lower percentage of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin, and despite the manual measurements in Fig. 9(a) appearing very similar, the interpatient variance is significantly higher (P < 0.05) indicating a level of inconsistency from patient-to-patient.…”
Section: Automated In Vivo Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Many optical spectroscopy techniques require processing (e.g., subtraction) of spectra, measured from different channels or detectors, 5,18,23,24 or fitting wavelength-dependent features in the spectrum. 23,[25][26][27][28] If the wavelength calibration on the detectors is not accurate or has shifted with time since initial factory calibration, then small features in the spectra can become large artifacts in the resulting processed spectra. This process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Wavelength Calibration Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first-order approximation to conceptualizing γ is the ratio of relative contributions of large to small scatters [27]. Previous work has reported γ values in tissue in the range of [1.3–2.2] [−] [12,14,26,31], with smaller values representative of scatterers that are smaller than the wavelength of scattered light and larger values representative of scatterers approaching the same length scale as the wavelength of light. While γ has been shown to be linearly proportional to the fractal dimension of scatterers in a turbid medium, a deterministic link between the two parameters is complicated by other physical parameters that influence the exact form of the scattering phase function [27]; therefore, a concise description of γ may best be as a metric proportional to the length scale of biological scattering features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the contrast at low spatial frequencies is dictated by absorption features (presence of blood, fat) and diffuse scattering (density of tissue), the contrast of sub-diffusive high spatial frequency images is dictated by both scattering intensity and the angular distribution of scattering events, or phase function, as photon propagation is constrained to superficial volumes with minimal volumetric averaging over tortuous photon path-lengths (Krishnaswamy et al 2014, Bodenschatz et al 2014). The phase function arises from the underlying physical properties of tissue ultrastructure (Bartek et al 2006, Rogers et al 2009, Radosevich et al 2015). Recent studies have used sub-diffusive structured light imaging to quantify angular scattering distributions through the phase function parameter γ , which is related to the size-scale distribution of scattering features (Kanick et al 2014, Bodenschatz et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%