2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subgraph centrality and clustering in complex hyper-networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
165
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So for such a complicated system we represented it using hypergraph notation because simple and bipartite or n-partite graph would not be sufficient to represent multidimensional and supra-dyadic relations that this system has (Estrada & Rodriguez-Velazquez, 2006) (Bonacich et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Case Of Dcfm-successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So for such a complicated system we represented it using hypergraph notation because simple and bipartite or n-partite graph would not be sufficient to represent multidimensional and supra-dyadic relations that this system has (Estrada & Rodriguez-Velazquez, 2006) (Bonacich et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Case Of Dcfm-successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One caveat of such an approach, however, is the relative paucity of available hypernetwork measures with which to investigate these more complicated objects. Recently, a handful of studies have proposed definitions for the hypernetwork analogue of some of the most popular complex network measures, such as the degree-distribution (Latapy et al, 2008), clustering coefficient (Estrada and Rodriguez-Velazquez, 2006;Zhou and Nakhleh, 2011;Gallagher and Goldberg, 2013) and measures of centrality (Estrada and Rodriguez-Velazquez, 2006;Pearcy et al, 2014). Unfortunately, these measures are often accompanied by increased algorithmic complexities, or are not well-posed, in the sense that a variety of different author-dependent definitions exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of more general logical structure as hypergraphs [7] seems to be more appropriate in these situations. Few attempts have been made to utilize hypergraphs in modeling a social network [8], and, more specifically, a scientific community network [9]. However, in our opinion, weighted multi-hypergraphs are the appropriate structures to represent multiple and weighted relationships.…”
Section: Introduction and Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%