NSIP 2005. Abstracts. IEEE-Eurasip Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/nsip.2005.1502267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective and objective quality assessment of noise reduced speech signals

Abstract: We propose a spatial subtraction array (SSA) and known noise superimposition to achieve a robust hands-free speech recognition under noisy environments. In the proposed SSA, noise reduction is achieved by subtracting the estimated noise power spectrum from the target speech power spectrum to be enhanced in the mel-scale filter bank domain. This offers a realization of error-robust spatial spectral subtraction with few computational complexities. In addition, we introduce known noise superimposition technique i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P.862 [1], is the most widelyused of this type. However, the PESQ method can give poor estimates for noise-reduced speech, as we reported in [2]. Egi et al recently proposed a full-reference objective quality evaluation method for noise-reduced speech and showed its effectiveness [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…P.862 [1], is the most widelyused of this type. However, the PESQ method can give poor estimates for noise-reduced speech, as we reported in [2]. Egi et al recently proposed a full-reference objective quality evaluation method for noise-reduced speech and showed its effectiveness [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Falk and Chan [15] made use of car noise, Hoth noise and babble noise, while comparing PESQ to two other objective quality models. Kitawaki and Yamada [16] used subway, car, babble and exhibition noise while comparing PESQ with subjective results for noise-reduced speech. Hu and Loizou [13] used 8 types of noise in developing the NOIZEUS corpus of noisy speech data for evaluating speech enhancement algorithms.…”
Section: A Background Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study indicates that, for this particular scenario, ensuring enough resources to active participants and prioritizing the audio quality are key to the overall audio-visual quality [28]. For audio content, a range of studies has focused on investigating the perceived quality effect of acoustic background noise [34,35]. In the study presented by Wendt et al [29], speech intelligibility was compared across different levels of background noise and syntactic structure complexity.…”
Section: Previous Work On Perceptual Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%