1994
DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1994.108.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective ethnolinguistic vitality: a comparison of two measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
44
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The third and last part of this instrument is an 8-item attitudinal scale. This scale was constructed following Allard and Landry (1994) and Miller (2000). It measures four types of attitudes or beliefs about language: general beliefs (facts which are perceived to exist between language communities); normative beliefs (what ought to be regarding the relative position between languages, according to the speaker); personal beliefs (the speakers sense of belonging to a group, his/her perceived efficacy in regard to language); and goal beliefs (the speakers desires and aspirations regarding his/her languages).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third and last part of this instrument is an 8-item attitudinal scale. This scale was constructed following Allard and Landry (1994) and Miller (2000). It measures four types of attitudes or beliefs about language: general beliefs (facts which are perceived to exist between language communities); normative beliefs (what ought to be regarding the relative position between languages, according to the speaker); personal beliefs (the speakers sense of belonging to a group, his/her perceived efficacy in regard to language); and goal beliefs (the speakers desires and aspirations regarding his/her languages).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This questionnaire was also based on Giles et al (1977), but was modified according to the typology of beliefs elaborated by Kreitler (1976, 1982): (a) general beliefs about how things are, (b) normative beliefs concerning what should exist, (c) personal beliefs about one's own behaviour, and (d) goal beliefs about one's desire to behave in a particular way. The BEVQ has since been applied (with modifications) in different settings (Allard & Landry, 1994;Evans, 1996;Kam, 2002). The main weakness of this model is that it measures respondents' assessment of objective ethnolinguistic vitality only.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'identité ethnolinguistique est la partie la plus affective de la disposition cognitivo-affective envers chacune des langues et chacun des groupes linguistiques (Allard & Landry, 1994;Landry & Rousselle, 2003). Elle comprend deux composantes distinctes : l'autodéfinition (le « ce que je suis ») et l'engagement identitaire, le degré auquel cette identité est valorisée et le degré d'engagement envers elle .…”
Section: Développement Psycholangagierunclassified