Subjective Measurement of Trust: Is It on the Level?

Abstract

Psychometrics are increasingly being used to evaluate trust in the automation of safety-critical systems. There is no consensus on what the highest level of measurement is for psychometric trust. This is important as the level of measurement determines what mathematics and statistics can be meaningfully applied to ratings. In this work, we introduce a new method for determining what the maximum level of measurement is for psychometric ratings. We use this to assess the level of measurement of trust in automation using human ratings about the behavior of unmanned aerial systems performing search tasks. Results show that trust is best represented at an ordinal level and that it can be treated as interval in most situations. It is unlikely that trust in automation ratings are ratio. We discuss these results, their implications, and future research.

Pengembangan Database Sistem Pemantauan Daya Panel Surya Berbasis Borland Delphi dan Komunikasi Nirkabel LoRa

“…Secara realtime tentunya akan terjadi keterlambatan pencatatan data yang dimungkinkan lebih dari 1 detik, hal ini mengakibatkan adanya selisih, sehingga data yang dicatat merupakan data yang tidak akurat. Penggunaan sistem akuisisi data berbasis database pemantauan daya panel surya, memungkinkan memperkecil skala interval sehingga hasil pencatatan data dapat dikatakan akurat, meskipun tetap memiliki jeda beberapa mili detik [12]- [16].…”

Action Over Words: Predicting Human Trust in AI Partners Through Gameplay Behaviors

“…Respondents may also provide answers that they believe are socially acceptable or Kiana Jafari Meimandi and Matthew L. Bolton are with the Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA (e-mail: kj6vd@virginia.edu, mlb4b@virginia.edu) Peter A. Beling is with the National Security Institute, Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA 22201, USA (e-mail: beling@vt.edu) expected, rather than their true feelings, which can skew data [5]. There is evidence that individual subjective trust ratings may not produce cardinal data [6], [7], which can limit the analyses that can be performed. Furthermore, There can be a disconnect between what people say and what they do.…”