Subjective quality of leisure &amp; worker well-being: Validating measures &amp; testing theory

Kuykendall, Lauren; Lei, Xue; Tay, Louis; Cheung, Ho Kwan; Kolze, MaryJo; Lindsey, Alex; Silvers, Morgan; Engelsted, Lia

doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.007

Cited by 28 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More importantly, leisure satisfaction, though with a small significant effect, improves SWB longitudinally. Recent empirical results confirmed this bottom-up process with stronger evidence that subjective quality of leisure is associated with SWB above and beyond the effects of highquality work and family experiences (Kuykendall et al, 2017). Leisure interventions among elderly and disabled populations enhance individuals' leisure experiences and benefit their SWB (e.g., Searle, Mahon, Iso-Ahola, & Sdrolias, 1995).…”

Section: Theoretical Mechanisms Linking Active Leisure To Subjective mentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Subjective Leisure Well-Being Pathway Kuykendall et al (2017) furthered the understanding of leisure by defining and validating a measure of subjective leisure well-being comprised of the following dimensions: leisure satisfaction, positive leisure affect, and negative leisure affect. This study also demonstrated that one's subjective judgment of leisure experiences is associated with workers' SWB.…”

Section: Theoretical Mechanisms Linking Active Leisure To Subjective mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

Barber

Santuzzi

2020

J Happiness Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Engagement in leisure activities during non-work hours has been associated with benefits to workers' general well-being through need fulfillment and satisfaction during leisure experiences. This study proposed an active leisure intervention that aims to improve workers' well-being. Based on the Job Demands-Resources model and Self-Determination Theory, this study explored whether an active leisure intervention is beneficial for leisure well-being (both subjective evaluation and need satisfaction components) across seven days and global subjective well-being. This study used an experimental daily diary study approach, which randomly assigned employed participants (N = 80) to engage in either an active leisure intervention for one week or receive no intervention. Participants in the active leisure intervention group experienced significantly higher level of life satisfaction and general positive affect after one week compared to those in no intervention group, after controlling pre-intervention subjective well-being. Multilevel modeling analyses were used to analyze daily leisure well-being outcomes collected over seven days. The active leisure intervention was effective in increasing competence during leisure, and this leisure competence mediated the effect of active leisure intervention on life satisfaction and general positive affect. Positive-activated leisure affect (i.e., active, excited) mediated the relationship between active leisure intervention and general positive affect. This research offers theoretical evidence that an active leisure intervention is effective among a working population and introducing a novel combination of experimental and daily diary designs. This intervention approach also has practical implications for organizations by providing insight into how to improve employee wellness through engagement in off-work positive activities.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Mechanisms Linking Active Leisure To Subjective mentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Theoretical Mechanisms Linking Active Leisure To Subjective mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

Barber

Santuzzi

2020

J Happiness Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This original conceptualization of satisfaction with leisure domain experiences has provided the basis for several theoretical and empirical studies on the antecedents and consequences of leisure satisfaction and on the associations between leisure satisfaction and subjective well-being indicators, such as happiness and general life satisfaction. Many studies currently conceptualize leisure satisfaction as a domain-specific indicator of subjective well-being (SWB), with leisure SWB focusing on the evaluations and affective reactions to leisure measured by leisure satisfaction or affective experiences in leisure (Kuykendall et al, 2017;Newman et al, 2014).…”

Section: Leisure Satisfaction: Conceptualization and Application In Ementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Newman et al (2014) emphasized the theoretical importance of leisure satisfaction by making it a key ingredient in a conceptual model for explaining subjective well-being. Also, in recent studies in the leisure sciences (Choi & Yoo, 2017;Ito & Walker, 2014;Ito, Walker, Liu, & Mitas, 2017) and in vocational psychology (Kuykendall et al, 2017;Kuykendall, Tay, & Ng, 2015) leisure satisfaction features as a core mediating or outcome variable. Most of these studies were cross-sectional.…”

Section: Leisure Satisfaction: Conceptualization and Application In Ementioning

confidence: 99%

How Stable is Leisure Satisfaction over Time? A Latent Trait-State-Occasion Analysis of Dutch Panel Data

Gelissen

2019

Leisure Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study used a trait-state-occasion (TSO) model to isolate stable trait variance, occasion-specific state variance, and shared method related variance in a measure for leisure satisfaction in a Dutch nationally representative nine-year panel study. Findings indicate that satisfaction with leisure time is a consistently stronger indicator of overall leisure satisfaction than satisfaction with leisure activities. About half of the variance in leisure satisfaction is stable trait variance, with the remaining variance being mostly occasion-specific and to a lesser extent attributable to shared method variance and error. However, these findings depend on the age group we consider. Several socio-demographic variables relate directly to the trait aspect of leisure satisfaction. Our study underscores the importance of recognizing that over time leisure satisfaction measurements have considerable stable and more volatile elements and that one should control for shared method effects. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

“…http://www.resci.net 景区 [14] 、主题公园 [15] 、文化创意型旅游地 [16] 等不同层面的旅游目的地游客满意度进行测评。而针对居民休闲满意度的研究主要从影响因素及其机制 [17,18] 、量化评价 [19] 、与生活满意度 [20,21] 和幸福感 [22] 的关系等方面进行探讨。在居民休闲满意度的量化评价上，应用较广的评价体系是 Beard 等提出的休闲满意度量表，包括心理、教育、社交、放松、生理、美学六大维度 [1] ，评价较为科学、系统。有学者运用该量表分析杭州市 [17,19] 、深圳市 [23] 居民的休闲满意度，该评价量表更多是针对休闲满意度的整体属性，并未涉及对城市休闲具体要素的评价。也有学者从休闲环境、休闲场所与设施、休闲活动等方面评价锦州市 [24] 、上海市、武汉市、成都市 [2] [25] ，对本地居民与到访游客的城市环境供给因素满意度及其对重游意愿的影响进行比较 [26] ，对入境游客与社区居民的旅游目的地旅游供给感知进行测评及差异分析 [27] [4,16] 、旅游景区 [7,28] 、酒店 [29] 、古村落 [30] [12,31] 、游客体验质量 [9] 、居民生活质量 [32] 评价指标体系内容进行选择。其中，对于休闲感知质量，本文从休闲活动、休闲服务与环境出发选择感知质量指图 1 城市休闲满意度模型注： ① "住宿设施条件、居民友好程度" 主要是从游客的角度进行体验 [9,11]…”

unclassified

游客与居民休闲满意度指数测评与比较——以北京市为例

吕宁¹,

Ning²,

吴新芳³

et al. 2019

zykx

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

引用格式：吕宁，吴新芳，韩霄, 等. 游客与居民休闲满意度指数测评与比较: 以北京市为例 [J]. 资源科学， 2019， 41 (5): 967-979. [Lyu N, Wu X F, Han X, et al. Evaluation and comparison of tourists and residents'urban leisure satisfaction: Taking Beijing as an example[J]. Resources Science， 2019， 41(5): 967-979.] 1 引言随着国民休闲意识的提高及休闲需求的快速增长，城市休闲功能日益凸显。城市容纳众多需求各异的休闲者，致使城市休闲活动也呈现出极大的复杂性与多元性。对所有休闲者来说，整座城市都成为他们体验的对象，因此，城市面临着如何更好地满足不同休闲者的休闲需求、完善休闲功能的挑战。在此背景下，城市休闲利益相关者对城市休闲供给感知评价显得尤为关键，其中游客与社区居民是重要的休闲主体。目前对不同休闲主体的城市休闲感知研究仍相对不足，但该研究对打造休闲都市、提升城市休闲质量具有重要的参考价值。据此，对游客与社区居民的城市休闲体验满意度进行评价，可以识别不同休闲主体的满意度水平及其所关注的城市休闲关键因子，为了解和解决城市休闲发展和管理提供更多行之有效的措施。提高城市休闲满意度，有利于提升城市休闲形象、打造城市休闲口碑、增强城市休闲吸引力。 Beard 等将休闲满意度定义为：个体由于参与休闲活动所展现、形成或获得的积极感受 [1] ，是个体从休闲体验中感觉到的满足程度，已得到较广泛的认可 [2] 。游客满意度的研究成果较为丰硕，集中在游客满意度的理论概念 [3] 、影响因素 [4] 、影响机制 [5,6] 、测评模型构建与实证研究 [7-9] 、旅游开发对策 [10] 等方面，研究侧重点有所不同。已有研究主要从传统旅游要素体验的视角，对国家 [11] 、城市 [12] 、世界遗产地 [13] 、旅游

show abstract

Subjective quality of leisure & worker well-being: Validating measures & testing theory

Cited by 28 publications

References 56 publications

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

How Stable is Leisure Satisfaction over Time? A Latent Trait-State-Occasion Analysis of Dutch Panel Data

游客与居民休闲满意度指数测评与比较——以北京市为例

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Subjective quality of leisure & worker well-being: Validating measures & testing theory

Cited by 28 publications

References 56 publications

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

Does Active Leisure Improve Worker Well-Being? An Experimental Daily Diary Approach

How Stable is Leisure Satisfaction over Time? A Latent Trait-State-Occasion Analysis of Dutch Panel Data

游客与居民休闲满意度指数测评与比较&#x02014;&#x02014;以北京市为例

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

游客与居民休闲满意度指数测评与比较——以北京市为例