2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2005.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective tests for image fusion evaluation and objective metric validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjective test database released by Petrovic [14] was selected for the metric validation. The database contained 120 pairs of registered gray image, all of which were captured in real or realistic conditions by using different sensors.…”
Section: Validation Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The subjective test database released by Petrovic [14] was selected for the metric validation. The database contained 120 pairs of registered gray image, all of which were captured in real or realistic conditions by using different sensors.…”
Section: Validation Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the fused images were evaluated based on the ITU recommendation [20] and widely used. In the work of Petrovic [14], the two indicators, namely, subjective relevance (SR) and correct ranking (CR), was suggested for an objective comparison of the fusion metrics. The higher the SR and CR, the better the performance of the image fusion metric.…”
Section: Validation Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although he used entropy in communication, the concept may be also employed as a measure and as a way of quantifying the information content of digital images [8]. A digital image consists of pixels arranged in rows and columns with each pixel being defined by both its position and its grey scale level.…”
Section: Entropy Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we have implemented and tested our method on other medical images with results that show an improvement over results obtained using DWT and FCT. In order to evaluate fused image quality we adopt the use of entropy (H), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and root mean square error (RMSE) [8] of the fused image. Fused image quality may also be evaluated by subjective criteria for example, if the entropy and PSNR values of a fused image are high whilst the value of RMSE is low then, we could infer that the quality of the fused image will be better.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%