2020
DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2020-1-11-43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Well-being of Migrants in Russia: Effects of Regional Characteristics and Migration Legislation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that autocracy-related variables play a crucial role in understanding the subjective well-being of crisis-driven migrants. This role often exceeds the role of income, employment, education, and social connections -well-established determinants of migrants' subjective well-being (Hendriks and Bartram, 2016;Kamalov and Ponarin, 2020;Tegegne and Glanville, 2019). Beyond that, we show, that autocrats' direct actions and indirect influence have a bigger impact on migrants' subjective well-being than the political or economic characteristics of the countries that host them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We show that autocracy-related variables play a crucial role in understanding the subjective well-being of crisis-driven migrants. This role often exceeds the role of income, employment, education, and social connections -well-established determinants of migrants' subjective well-being (Hendriks and Bartram, 2016;Kamalov and Ponarin, 2020;Tegegne and Glanville, 2019). Beyond that, we show, that autocrats' direct actions and indirect influence have a bigger impact on migrants' subjective well-being than the political or economic characteristics of the countries that host them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Overall, the results presented indicate that variables related to the actions of autocratic states are pivotal in understanding the subjective well-being of political migrants. In terms of standardized coefficients (see Table 5 and Table 6), the effects of most of these variables are comparable to, or even exceed, those of economic and social capital variables that are standard predictors in migration literature (Hendriks and Bartram, 2016;Kamalov and Ponarin, 2020;Tegegne and Glanville, 2019). Furthermore, the combined effects of discrimination, fears of transnational repressions, and group-based feelings on affective well-being surpass 8 the combined effects of economic and social capital variables included in the model.…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Autocracy-related Variablesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this article is to study these processes and develop recommendations for the formation of individual and group behavior, aimed at creating and implementing new technologies that are in demand in a dynamically developing society (Kamalov & Ponarin, 2020) However, while formal institutions that influence the development of the innovation process and the active role of individuals in this process are relatively well studied, informal institutions are insufficiently studied and there is a need for further research to explain many economic phenomena that cannot be justified and described using only knowledge about the impact of formal institutions on them.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%