2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitized children with atopic dermatitis: a randomized, open, parallel-group study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to systematic reviews and meta‐analyses, SCIT is helpful in alleviating symptoms and reducing medication in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma, whereas its benefits for atopic dermatitis (AD) are still unclear . However, some clinical trials and reports of AD patient experience have been highly encouraging . Sublingual, intralymphatic and epicutaneous immunotherapy have also been evaluated.…”
Section: Allergen Immunotherapy (Ait) From Human Beings To Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to systematic reviews and meta‐analyses, SCIT is helpful in alleviating symptoms and reducing medication in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma, whereas its benefits for atopic dermatitis (AD) are still unclear . However, some clinical trials and reports of AD patient experience have been highly encouraging . Sublingual, intralymphatic and epicutaneous immunotherapy have also been evaluated.…”
Section: Allergen Immunotherapy (Ait) From Human Beings To Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live virus or bacterial vac-tions are the major focus of published clinical trials for oral mucosal vaccination. [580][581][582][583] There are few clinical data on traditional prophylactic vaccines delivered via the SL or buccal route, although studies are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov for influenza, cholera, and HPV. 584,585 Preclinical studies of SL vaccines have demonstrated immunogenicity in mice using viral vectors such as adenovirus-based vaccines [586][587][588] and bacterial vectors such as Bacillus subtilis.…”
Section: Challenges For Mucosal Delivery Of Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk of evidence for the effectiveness of ASIT in humans is for the management of allergic rhinitis and asthma; in fact, some authorities have considered its usefulness in human AD to be questionable. On the one hand, this position has been reinforced by systematic reviews concluding that that the strength of recommendation for use of ASIT in human AD is weak; on the other, some clinical trials and reports of patient experience have been highly encouraging, even in refractory cases …”
Section: Introduction: Why Allergen‐specific Immunotherapy?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the one hand, this position has been reinforced by systematic reviews concluding that that the strength of recommendation for use of ASIT in human AD is weak; 3 on the other, some clinical trials and reports of patient experience have been highly encouraging, even in refractory cases. [4][5][6] In dogs, this controversy seemingly never arose, perhaps due to early reports of success in CAD; as even in a placebo-controlled trial, results provided initial reason for optimism in allergic skin disease. [7][8][9] Based on these and other studies, "response rates" (typically quoted as percentage of dogs that experience at least 50% improvement in clinical signs) are typically quoted as 60-70%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%