2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subseasonal variations in marine reservoir age from pre-bomb Donax obesulus and Protothaca asperrima shell carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, dates were calibrated using a mixture of SHCal13 ( 63 ) and the Marine13 calibration curves ( 64 ) based on estimates ranging from 20 to 40 (±10)% marine dietary component, depending on the δ 15 N values ( Dataset S1 ). Marine reservoir correction was performed using a ΔR value of 110 ± 49, derived from the most proximate marine reservoir study conducted in Paracas, Peru ( 65 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, dates were calibrated using a mixture of SHCal13 ( 63 ) and the Marine13 calibration curves ( 64 ) based on estimates ranging from 20 to 40 (±10)% marine dietary component, depending on the δ 15 N values ( Dataset S1 ). Marine reservoir correction was performed using a ΔR value of 110 ± 49, derived from the most proximate marine reservoir study conducted in Paracas, Peru ( 65 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine reservoir corrections (ΔR), which are often based on reservoir ages of marine shells, can be integrated into radiocarbon calibration to produce more accurate dates. Although available ΔR values for the Pacific coast can vary greatly (Taylor & Berger 1967; Jones et al 2007) and are undoubtedly affected by diachronic variability due to coastal upwelling (Latorre et al 2017), Etayo-Cadavid et al (2019) have found no statistically significant difference in the reservoir ages of Donax obesulus and Protothaca asperrima shells collected in northern and central Peru. Their ΔR value for the Paracas area (110±49, calculated according to the Marine13 calibration curve) is derived from an average of 30 dates made on two modern (pre-bomb) shells, and provides the most proximate and best available estimate of ΔR for the Chincha Valley.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeological shells can also be used to study intra-and inter-shell variability in radiocarbon signals that affect calibrations and SST reconstructions (Dusseault 2021). In conjunction with oxygen isotope analysis, radiocarbon dates can also be used to study variation in coastal upwelling (Monge and Alveirinho 2006;Ferguson et al 2013;Etayo-Cadavid et al 2019) or to calculate a geographically localized marine reservoir correction (ΔR) necessary for calibrating marine radiocarbon dates (Betts 2019;Heaton et al 2020). Combining the season of death with an approximate age of harvested bivalves further permits long-term interpretation of the frequency, intensity, and season of shellfish harvesting and thus insight into cultural practices (Burchell et al 2014;Ambrose et al 2016;Betts et al 2017).…”
Section: Mollusk Archivesmentioning
confidence: 99%