2022
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substantial increase in the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Western Norway over 20 years

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and describe characteristics of the RRD population. Methods: Retrospective, observational case series. Data on residents of South Rogaland, Norway, diagnosed with primary RRD in the period 2000-2019 were obtained by medical chart review. Patient demographics and prior intraocular surgery were documented. Incidence rates adjusted to the Norwegian population were calculated for 5-year periods and stratified by age, sex and lens stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty percent of the increase could be explained by demographic factors. The sharpest increase was in pseudophakic retinal detachment [18].…”
Section: Scandinaviamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty percent of the increase could be explained by demographic factors. The sharpest increase was in pseudophakic retinal detachment [18].…”
Section: Scandinaviamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…30 % des Anstiegs ließen sich durch demografische Faktoren erklären. Der stärkste Anstieg erfolgte bei den Pseudophakie-Ablationes [18].…”
Section: Skandinavienunclassified
“…Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is a common public health problem that can lead to visual impairment and mainly affects individuals over 50 years of age. The morbidity of RRD is approximately 12.17/100000 and has been gradually increasing in recent years (1)(2)(3). Although nearly 90% of surgeries result in retinal reattachment (4,5), visual recovery remains disappointing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%