2002
DOI: 10.1086/342425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substellar Mass Function of Young Open Clusters as Determined through a Statistical Approach Using Two Micron All Sky Survey and Guide Star Catalog Data

Abstract: In this paper we present the mass functions in the substellar regime of three young open clusters, IC 348, σ Orionis and Pleiades, as derived using the data from the 2 Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) catalogue which has a limiting magnitude of K s ∼ 15, and the latest version of the Guide Star Catalogue (GSC) which has a limiting magnitude of F 4 ∼ 21. Based on recent evolutionary models for low mass stars, we have formulated the selection criteria for stars with masses below 0.5M ⊙ . Using a statistical approac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the median primary mass of 0.72 M , our result indicates a secondary-mass spectrum that is approximately flat down to 0.2 M and possibly higher between 0.07 and 0.2 M . This differs from the monotonic rise toward low masses found in the single-star initial mass functions (IMFs) of young open clusters (e.g., Barrado y Navascues et al Tej et al 2002;Moraux et al 2003) and the much younger starforming regions (Luhman et al 2000). It also differs from the lognormal IMF derived by Chabrier (2003) for the galactic field stars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Using the median primary mass of 0.72 M , our result indicates a secondary-mass spectrum that is approximately flat down to 0.2 M and possibly higher between 0.07 and 0.2 M . This differs from the monotonic rise toward low masses found in the single-star initial mass functions (IMFs) of young open clusters (e.g., Barrado y Navascues et al Tej et al 2002;Moraux et al 2003) and the much younger starforming regions (Luhman et al 2000). It also differs from the lognormal IMF derived by Chabrier (2003) for the galactic field stars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Recent investigations have pointed out, however, that the fraction of young BDs relative to low-mass and more massive PMS stars may vary significantly among different star-forming regions (Kroupa 2002). In particular, the fraction in OB associations (Boulanger et al 1998;Hillenbrand & Carpenter 2000;Barrado y Navascués et al 2001;Briceño et al 2002;Muench et al 2002) exceeds that determined for T associations (Comerón et al 2000;Béjar et al 2001;Tej et al 2002;Briceño et al 2002;Spezzi et al 2007), suggesting that the environment may have an important impact on the BD formation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was applied in Orionis, IC 348, and the Pleiades [62]. These studies are very useful to probe the large scale structure of clusters, determine globally their mass functions, and study possible variations radially.…”
Section: Wide-field Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%