2019
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1655723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituting face-to-face contacts in academics’ collaborations: modern communication tools, proximity, and brokerage

Abstract: Prior analyses of face-to-face contacts in collaborations have focused on one substitute only. Instead, we analyse various potential substitutes for face-to-face contacts in collaborations. Based on 45 interviews with academics from five leading European universities of technology our findings show that face-to-face contacts are closely intertwined with other mechanisms of coordination and communication for collaboration, particularly modern communication tools, proximity, and brokerage. Generally, to add pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, knowledge integration rests on a minimum level of cognitive overlap, with temporary geographical proximity being argued to play a supportive role (Boschma, 2005;Santos et al, 2020;Torre, 2008). Recent research demonstrate that for academics in relationships with industry partners, temporary face-to-face contact, in combination with modern communication tools, is crucial to overcoming cognitive distance (Werker & Ooms, 2020). On the other hand, research also demonstrates that cognitive proximity is a substitute for geographical proximity in stimulating longdistance collaboration (Garcia et al, 2018).…”
Section: Temporary Geographical and Cognitive Proximitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, knowledge integration rests on a minimum level of cognitive overlap, with temporary geographical proximity being argued to play a supportive role (Boschma, 2005;Santos et al, 2020;Torre, 2008). Recent research demonstrate that for academics in relationships with industry partners, temporary face-to-face contact, in combination with modern communication tools, is crucial to overcoming cognitive distance (Werker & Ooms, 2020). On the other hand, research also demonstrates that cognitive proximity is a substitute for geographical proximity in stimulating longdistance collaboration (Garcia et al, 2018).…”
Section: Temporary Geographical and Cognitive Proximitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, students have an active role in both learning processes as setting goals, managing activities or the choice of resources to use, among others [32][33][34][35]. On the other hand, the technological paradigm conceives the PLE as a kind of platform composed of a content repository with different management and communication tools [36][37][38]. In this perspective of the PLE, students develop a digital identity and they determine what information to share and when, with whom to share it with and how to do it effectively, and when and whom to merge with to exchange experiences [39,40].…”
Section: Tools and Strategies In Plementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, technological systems for ERP, SCM or CRM make it possible for firms to integrate knowledge resources through backward linkage with suppliers and forward linkage with customers. In addition, IT infrastructure opens new opportunities for collaborative innovation at a distance (Werker and Ooms, 2019). IT infrastructure facilitates interactions between a firm and its external innovation partners, thus strengthening the positive impact of innovation modes on a firm's innovation performance.…”
Section: The Moderating Role Of Information Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%