Substituting meat and the role of a situational context: exploring associations and motives of Dutch meat substitute-users

Abstract

PurposeThe Dutch market for meat substitutes has grown steadily, however, their market share is still low, and meat consumption in the Netherlands is not decreasing. For a transition towards a more plant-based diet, understanding consumer motives regarding meat substitutes is important. The purpose of this study was to explore what motives lay behind the appropriateness of the use of meat substitutes in different usage situations.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 20 semi-structured in-depth interviews were performed to discover Dutch consumers’ associations with the terms “eating vegetarian” and “meat substitutes”, as well as motives regarding the situational appropriateness of meat substitutes.FindingsThe most mentioned motives for eating vegetarian were “environmental impact”, “health” and “animal welfare”, while meat substitutes were mainly eaten to replace meat in the meal. Most participants perceived vegetarian stir-fry pieces appropriate for almost all situations; the appropriateness of other meat substitutes was more situation-specific. The thematic content analysis yielded seven categories for the motives given for the (in)appropriateness of the four meat substitutes in six usage situations: “Functionality”, “Convenience”, “Properties”, “Preferences”, “Association with meat”, “Association with meals” and “Nutrition”. Mainly motives in the categories convenience and functionality (function of the meat substitute in a meal) were mentioned for all situations and other motives were situation-specific.Originality/valueThe focus in the development of plant-based foods is mostly on the product properties. The situational appropriateness and the underlying motives regarding meat substitutes have not yet been studied. This exploratory study suggests that these should be taken into consideration in the design of new meat substitutes.

Innovative food and sustainable consumption behaviour: the role of communication focus and consumer-related characteristics in lab-grown meat (LGM) consumption

“…Apparently, the main reasons for this shift in consumers' approach to the meat consumption relies on the growing attention given to the impact of such behaviours over the environment, health and the so-called “animal welfare” (i.e. the avoidance of intensive animal farming) (Elzerman et al ., 2022). Thus, more research in this trajectory is needed.…”

US consumers’ mental associations with meat substitute products

“…On the other hand, other research revealed a lack of awareness of the mental association between meat consumption and climate change ( 44 ). In depth interviews with 20 Dutch consumers revealed mainly positive or neutral mental associations with meat substitutes, such as “traditional meat replacement,” “nutrition substitution” or “specific meat substitute products” ( 45 ). Interestingly, there was no consensus on the requirements for meat substitute products, some respondents indicated that meat substitute products should be similar to real meat while others held the opposite opinion.…”

“…Interestingly, there was no consensus on the requirements for meat substitute products, some respondents indicated that meat substitute products should be similar to real meat while others held the opposite opinion. It needs to be mentioned that all of the 20 respondents were familiar with meat substitute products and some of them were vegetarian ( 45 ). However, other studies acknowledged the challenge to attract not only vegetarians but people who regularly eat meat ( 16 ).…”

Prospects for Plant-Based Meat: Current Standing, Consumer Perceptions, and Shifting Trends

“…In the extrusion process, several factors are involved in the retention or loss of volatile compounds, including raw material composition and moisture content, extrusion conditions (residence time, extruder temperature, compression and pressure, vapor loss during expansion, and diffusivity of the volatiles in the mass). Elzerman et al [ 56 ] reported that PBM products that mimic the sensory characteristics of meat may appeal to consumers who frequently consume meat. However, when sensory characteristics do not meet consumer expectations, even products with health benefits may be rejected by customers [ 85 ].…”

“…Negative perceptions are more frequent in people who have not tried PBM products or who like animal meat and do not want to reduce their meat intake at any cost [ 54 , 55 ]. Elzerman et al [ 56 ] suggested that not everyone needs to go vegetarian but that reducing intake of meat a few days a week could help transition towards PBM and possibly lessen health-related issues associated with higher meat consumption.…”