2021
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c03739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substoichiometric 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks Based on Hexagonal Linkers

Abstract: Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), a fast-growing field in crystalline porous materials, have achieved tremendous success in structure development and application exploration over the past decade. The vast majority of COFs reported to date are designed according to the basic concept of reticular chemistry, which is rooted in the idea that building blocks are fully connected within the frameworks. We demonstrate here that sub-stoichiometric construction of 2D/3D COFs can be accomplished by the condensation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, 3D-bor-COF-3 is a non-interpenetrated structure, so its pore size achieved 3.8 nm, which is among the highest record of 3D COFs (Figure 1 and Table S2). [38][39][40][41] We also measured the pore sizes by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), which is identical to the theoretical model (Figures 2(D), 2(H), and 2(I)).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, 3D-bor-COF-3 is a non-interpenetrated structure, so its pore size achieved 3.8 nm, which is among the highest record of 3D COFs (Figure 1 and Table S2). [38][39][40][41] We also measured the pore sizes by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), which is identical to the theoretical model (Figures 2(D), 2(H), and 2(I)).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Remarkably, 3D‐bor‐COF‐3 is a non‐interpenetrated structure, so its pore size achieved 3.8 nm, which is among the highest record of 3D COFs (Figure 1 and Table S2). 38–41 We also measured the pore sizes by high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), which is identical to the theoretical model (Figures 2(D), 2(H), and 2(I)). To construct the bor COF, we selected the stereoscopic building unit 3,3′,5,5′‐tetrakis (4‐formylphenyl)bimesityl (TFBM) with a planar triangular building unit, 1,3,5‐tri(4‐aminophenyl)benzene (TAPB).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is worth of noting that the C 2 H 2 /CH 4 selectivity of ZJUT‐3 is much higher than that of other reported materials, such as ZJNU‐69 (34.5), [34] ZJU‐199a (33.5), [35] and NOTT‐101 (26.7) [36] . The C 2 H 2 /CO 2 selectivity is comparable to some of best adsorbents, such as UPC‐112 (2.8), [37] FJU‐90 (4.3), [38] and 2D sql COFs (4.8) [39] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…75,76 However, 3D COFs have an abundant changeable topology. 77 3D COFs with ctn, 32,78 bor, 32 dia, 33,79 rra, 80 pts, [81][82][83][84][85] lon, 86 ljh, 87 and nbo 88 topologies have been formed based on fourconnected monomers with tetrahedral T d symmetry. Sixconnected monomers with trigonal prism D 3h symmetry led to stp, 89 ceq, 90 acs, [91][92][93] and hea 94 topologies, while D 3d -and C 3symmetric six-connected monomers have been implemented in the synthesis of 3D COFs with pcu 95 and soc 96 topologies, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%