2005
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate discrimination in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage: importance of the structural environment of the RNase P cleavage site

Abstract: Like the translational elongation factor EF-Tu, RNase P interacts with a large number of substrates where RNase P with its RNA subunit generates tRNAs with matured 5′ termini by cleaving tRNA precursors immediately 5′ of the residue at +1, i.e. at the position that corresponds to the first residue in tRNA. Most tRNAs carry a G+1C+72 base pair at the end of the aminoacyl acceptor-stem whereas in tRNAGln G+1C+72 is replaced with U+1A+72. Here, we investigated RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage as a function of having… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(105 reference statements)
8
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…pATSerUG was either purchased from Dharmacon USA (Lafayette, CO) or prepared as run-off transcripts by using T7 DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This model substrate is cleaved as efficiently as precursor tRNAs (12). The different tRNA precursors were generated as run-off transcripts (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pATSerUG was either purchased from Dharmacon USA (Lafayette, CO) or prepared as run-off transcripts by using T7 DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This model substrate is cleaved as efficiently as precursor tRNAs (12). The different tRNA precursors were generated as run-off transcripts (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). This situation may be reminiscent of the modified enzyme-substrate interaction described in the 39-CCA region of the tRNA precursor (Kikovska et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…22 The structural topography of the + 73/294 interaction can influence the cleavage and binding of functionally important metal(II) ions (e.g., Mg 2+ ) at and in the vicinity of the cleavage site. 19,29,30,[33][34][35][36][37][38] This therefore raises the possibility that a productive TSL/TBS interaction, required for efficient cleavage at the correct site, involves the positioning of metal(II) ions near the cleavage site (see the text below). In this context, we also note that increasing the size of the T-loop in SELEX (Selective Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment)-evolved substrates lowers the cleavage efficiency (k cat /K m ) for EcoRPR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%