2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-015-1096-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate elasticity regulates the behavior of human monocyte-derived macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
89
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macrophages on stiff PDMS surfaces moved faster, showed longer movement tracks, and the cells were more spread than those on soft PDMS surfaces. These results are consistent with the report of Blakney et al (2012), that the macrophages on stiff PEG hydrogel (840 kPa) are more spread than those on soft PEG hydrogel (130 kPa); and the report of Adlerz et al (2016), which showed that the human monocyte-derived macrophages moves faster on stiff polyacrylamide hydrogel (280 kPa) than soft polyacrylamide hydrogel (3 kPa), although the materials and the ranges of stiffness are different from our study. While previous works on the effects of surface stiffness on macrophages focus on hydrogels, our results show that macrophages are also more active in the presence of E. coli biofilm cells on hydrophobic PDMS surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The macrophages on stiff PDMS surfaces moved faster, showed longer movement tracks, and the cells were more spread than those on soft PDMS surfaces. These results are consistent with the report of Blakney et al (2012), that the macrophages on stiff PEG hydrogel (840 kPa) are more spread than those on soft PEG hydrogel (130 kPa); and the report of Adlerz et al (2016), which showed that the human monocyte-derived macrophages moves faster on stiff polyacrylamide hydrogel (280 kPa) than soft polyacrylamide hydrogel (3 kPa), although the materials and the ranges of stiffness are different from our study. While previous works on the effects of surface stiffness on macrophages focus on hydrogels, our results show that macrophages are also more active in the presence of E. coli biofilm cells on hydrophobic PDMS surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore,m echanical flexibility of exogenous elements within cells could be acritical design parameter toward engineering organic intracellular constructs to endow cells with unnatural yet stable and beneficial features for therapeutic applications.F inally,v iscoelasticity,p ressures and connected mechano-transductive elements are connected to inflammatory cell phenotypes. [45][46][47][48][49] As such, the mechanochemical characterization of intracellular properties could be important for cell-based mechano-biological applications leading to an ew class of pharmaceutics:m echano-pharmaceutics.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies on hour timescales, anti-SIRPα increased phagocytosis of Ab-opsonized targets both in vitro [7, 15] and in vivo [10], but macrophage trafficking and function for days or weeks in the more biological contexts of circulation and 3D tissue microenvironments present a distinct challenge. On long timescales, in vitro differentiation of macrophages [16, 17] and other adherent marrow cells [18, 19] is modulated by the stiffness of their microenvironments among other factors, but in vivo evidence is lacking. We use human solid tumor models established in NSG mice (non-obese diabetic/ severe combined IL-2Rγ mice), which lack T cells, B cells (and Abs), and natural killer (NK) cells while maintaining functional monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%