“…For each segment, reported phenotypes are counted using the + symbol. References for cases in the table: q11 → qter: (Eggermann et al, 1998; Hahm et al, 1987; Nevin et al, 1983; Ridler & McKeown, 1979); q12 → qter: (Chen et al, 2003; Paladini et al, 1999); q13 → qter: (Buckton & Barr, 1981; Davison & Beesley, 1984; Dowman et al, 1989; Hatanaka et al, 1984; Luberda‐Zapaśnik et al, 1995); q21 → qter: (Balestrazzi et al, 1979; Calva et al, 1984; de Carvalho et al, 2010; Garau et al, 1980; Lessick et al, 1989; Maher et al, 1991; Mishra et al, 2018; Yue et al, 2019); q22 → qter: (Basinko et al, 2011; Houlston et al, 1994; Nyhan et al, 1989; Rethoré et al, 1982; Sousa et al, 2004; Tsien et al, 2005); q23 → qter: (Basinko et al, 2011; Maher et al, 1991; Papadopoulou et al, 2017; Savary et al, 1991); q24 → qter: (Baker et al, 2002; Brisset et al, 2002; Ferrero et al, 2006; Giardino et al, 2001; Maher et al, 1991; Zahn et al, 2005; Zhou et al, 2013); Unknown: (Eriksson et al, 1971; Ferguson Jr. & Hicks, 1987; Francke, 1972). These publications did not utilize modern chromosome analysis techniques; however, the phenotypic description is most consistent with involvement of large segment of 16q; for reference (Francke, 1972), the relevant case is #10.…”