2020
DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subthalamic Nucleus Subregion Stimulation Modulates Inhibitory Control

Abstract: Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) often experience reductions in the proficiency to inhibit actions. The motor symptoms of PD can be effectively treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the Subthalamic nucleus (STN), a key structure in the frontal-striatal network that may be directly involved in regulating inhibitory control. However, the precise role of the STN in stopping control is unclear. The STN consists of functional sub-territories linked to dissociable cortical networks although the boundari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, although the unified standardized DBS surgery was adopted among PD patients via a neurosurgeon, we were still not able to control the absolute consistency of the position of electrodes implanted in all patients. In addition, the target implanted in this study was STN, which is divided into different sub-regions ( van Wijk et al, 2020 ; van Wouwe et al, 2020 ). The damage caused by implantation in different sub-regions can induce different alterations in brain function.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, although the unified standardized DBS surgery was adopted among PD patients via a neurosurgeon, we were still not able to control the absolute consistency of the position of electrodes implanted in all patients. In addition, the target implanted in this study was STN, which is divided into different sub-regions ( van Wijk et al, 2020 ; van Wouwe et al, 2020 ). The damage caused by implantation in different sub-regions can induce different alterations in brain function.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis that ventral STN might be dedicated to cognitive functions and dorsal STN to motor functions ( Jahanshahi et al., 2015 ) stems from the observation that prefrontal cortical areas project to the former, whereas motor and premotor cortices project to the latter ( Haynes and Haber, 2013 ). This observation has been corroborated by the effects on DBS outcome of the location of the target stimulation in the dorsoventral/occipitorostral axis of the STN ( Greenhouse et al., 2013 ; Scherrer et al., 2020 ; van Wouwe et al., 2017 , 2020 ).…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulation Beyond Motor Control: Mood and Decisi...mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Upper limb inhibitory control has been tested using various tasks such as the stop-signal, Simon, and Go/No-Go tasks. During the stop-signal task, STN DBS has been shown to improve [34][35][36][37] or worsen 38,39 measures of reactive inhibition and to improve measures of proactive inhibition. 39,40 However, it should be acknowledged that one study reporting worsened stop-signal performance used the more cognitively demanding conditional stop-signal task suggesting that the impairment with STN DBS could have been due to other executive functions rather than inhibitory control.…”
Section: Effect Of Stn Dbs On Eye and Upper Limb Inhibitory Control T...mentioning
confidence: 99%