2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, [67] discusses about the important role of perceived value in citizens' continuance use of mobile government. Recently, the perceived value to citizens is one of major success factors that should be considered when designing eParticipation initiatives [50]. So, it deemed reasonable to suggest that positive citizens' expectations of values and benefits that they would perceive from engaging in e-Participation initiatives could increase their intention to involve in such initiatives.…”
Section: Perceived Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, [67] discusses about the important role of perceived value in citizens' continuance use of mobile government. Recently, the perceived value to citizens is one of major success factors that should be considered when designing eParticipation initiatives [50]. So, it deemed reasonable to suggest that positive citizens' expectations of values and benefits that they would perceive from engaging in e-Participation initiatives could increase their intention to involve in such initiatives.…”
Section: Perceived Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, research in e-participation shows that several factors may determine the success or failure of e-participation initiatives, such as the legal framework, funding, organizational structure and culture, commitment by politicians, administrators and staff, the complexity of e-tools, security and privacy issues, the combination with offline activities, the communication and promotion plan, the moderation of debates, the degree of inclusiveness and transparency-related issues (e.g., references [14,15,17,22]). However, their importance in the different stages of development of e-participation initiatives has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the development of enhanced e-Participation initiatives is at the heart of worldwide e-Government strategies [49]. In such context, it is common to find that e-Participation is considered an integral part of e-Government [10,50]. However, government-led e-Participation initiatives is mainly informational and do not promote interactivity since they usually focus on information dissemination, enhancing e-service delivery, and fostering transparency [9,51].…”
Section: E-participation Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While e-Participation knowledge puts forward arguments on why separating the technological or social perspectives appear inadequate to explain and investigate e-Participation [1,21,22,50], few studies overcome the internal disciplinary boundaries that exist at the moment among e-Participation research [4]. The internal disciplinary boundaries appear in the lack of researches that link and interlace several e-Participation themes together, such as connecting stakeholders, tools and environment when they are studying e-Participation topics [4].…”
Section: Proposition 2: Remedy E-participation Internal Disciplinary mentioning
confidence: 99%