2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Success of Simple Probing and Irrigation in Patients With Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Otitis Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The current study's success rate also compares favorably with balloon dacryocystoplasty which although it has found a high success rate for recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction, 5,16,17 appears to offer no significant advantage over simple probing as a primary treatment. 18,19 The timing of surgical intervention for nasolacrimal duct obstruction is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The current study's success rate also compares favorably with balloon dacryocystoplasty which although it has found a high success rate for recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction, 5,16,17 appears to offer no significant advantage over simple probing as a primary treatment. 18,19 The timing of surgical intervention for nasolacrimal duct obstruction is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A large, prospective randomized, study would be necessary to more directly evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of silastic intubation versus simple probing in the initial treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction obstruction. 10 110 97% 88% 92% Robb (1998) 11 280 98% from 0 to 24 mo 100% Mannor (1999) 12 142 92% 89% 69% Honavar (2000) 13 60 All patients Ն 24 mo of age 73% (median age 33 mo) Kashkowli and Kassaee (2002) 14 207 92% 85% 65% Lee and Fudenberg (2005) 15 138 Age range 4.5 to 36 mo (average, 12.4) Success rate 86%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of probing with or without silastic intubation reported in other studies range from 55% to 96%. (18,19,20,21,22,23,24) The success rate of probing in our study was 82 %. This lower rate may be due to inclusion of some complicated cases like previously failed cases and associated with craniofacial anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Number of Eyes Success Rate of Simple Probing as per the Age 0-12 months 13-24 months >24 months Katowitz and Welsh (30) 572 97% 69% 33.3% Zwaan (31) 110 97% 88% 92% Robb (22) 280 98% from 0 to 24 months Mannor et al (27) 142 92% 89% 69% Honavar et al (20) 60 All patients>24 months age Maheswari (21) 84 88.1% 80.1% Kashkouli et al (29) 207 92% 85% 65% Repka et al (19) 955 78% 79% 79% Lee et al (24) 138 Overall success rate of 86% (average age of 12.4 months) Present study Number of eyes 12-23 months 24-35 months ≥36 months Balakrishnan et al 22 100% 100% 40% Table 5. Success rate of probing in previous studies…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-11 Questionnaires have been used infrequently, and then in only simple form, to assess NLDO outcomes. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] We are unaware of any previous attempt to prospectively use a comprehensive questionnaire to assess severity of symptoms and health related quality of life (HRQL) in congenital NLDO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%