Success variables in science and technology parks

Martín, José Guadix; Carrillo-Castrillo, Jesús Antonio; Onieva, Luis; Navascués, Javier de

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.045

Cited by 74 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hogan (1996) divides performance of Science Parks into two different categories: (i) intrinsic, those related to the attainment of technological synergy, and (ii) extrinsic, related to economic development. Albahari, Catalano, and Landoni (2013), Guadix et al (2016) and Lee and Yang (2000) discuss other performance dimensions such as years of operation, R&D expenditures, the incomes and the innovation outcomes of the tenant firms, and linkages with local universities and research centres. Bigliardi, Dormio, Nosella, and Petroni (2006) and Guy (1996) highlight the network of partners has a significant impact on Science Park performance.…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Science Parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship

Löfsten

Klofsten

Cadorin

2020

European Planning Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to expand our understanding of talent attraction management in Science Parks with a specific interest in university students/alumni as a human and strategic resource. The underlying rationale is how the links with universities can be supported and how the Science Park management can contribute to successful relationships with universities and university students/alumni, in order to develop tenant firms and the park itself. A questionnaire was sent out in 2018-120 parks. This study includes 25 variables, and four significant regression models are presented. The main finding is that Science Park talent attraction activities act as a mediating variable, which affects the informal and formal partnerships between students and firms/universities as well as how the park management can contribute to successful relationships. By attracting students, tenant firms can have a positive impact on their performance as well as Science Park development.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Science Parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship

Löfsten

Klofsten

Cadorin

2020

European Planning Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research has shown that these integrated services can significantly increase the success rate of start‐ups (Cohen, ). Second, incubation centres are often operated by universities in their science parks; their objective is to promote collaboration between technology‐based start‐ups and university research facilities (Guadix, Carrillo‐Castrillo, Onieva, & Navascués, ). As compared to accelerators, which are highly competitive and focus on short‐term programs, incubation centres are more accessible to start‐ups and focus on long‐term programs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‐organization in Zhongguancun, China

Pan

Zhou

et al. 2018

Information Systems Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extant studies on digital entrepreneurship have mainly focused on firm-level characteristics and overlooked the external environment, ie, the digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE). This study intends to fill that gap by exploring how a DEE emerges. We adopt the metaorganization theory as our theoretical lens and conduct an in-depth case study at Zhongguancun, a budding DEE often referred to as China's Silicon Valley. Case analysis reveals that the emergence of a DEE is a process of forming a meta-organization, whereby labour is divided into 3 roles and effort is integrated via 2 processes. Our study contributes to the digital entrepreneurship literature by offering a community perspective. It also contributes to the literature on meta-organization, which has mainly focused on the globally distributed meta-organizations and overlooked the collocated metaorganizations such as a DEE. Regarding practical implications, policymakers and community leaders responsible for DEE development can use our findings to develop their local DEEs. KEYWORDScase study, digital entrepreneurial ecosystem, digital entrepreneurship, meta-organization "IT is the magic ingredient that inspires and most often enables contemporary entrepreneurial endeavours."-MIS Quarterly Editor note by Del Giudice and Straub (2011, p. vi).

show abstract

Section: úVodunclassified

“…Vedecké parky predstavujú lokality, ktoré zabezpečujú správu nehnuteľností a vytvárajú možnosti na prenos myšlienok a poznatkov medzi priemyslom a akademickou obcou (Hansson, 2005). Vedecké a technologické parky zohrávajú významnú úlohu v ekonomickom rozvoji, pričom sú dôležitý faktor v konkurencieschopnosti hospodárstva (Guadix, 2016).Podľa UNESCO tento pojem zahŕňa akýkoľvek technologický klaster ako sú: technopolis, vedecký park, science city, cyber park, hi tech (priemyselný) park, inovačné centrum, VaV park, univerzitný výskumný park (UVP), výskumný technologický park, vedecký a technologický park (VTP), science town, technologický park, technologický inkubátor, technopark, technopolis a technologický biznis inkubátor. UVP a VTP patria medzi najčastejšie zmieňované odnože komplexných VaV infraštruktúr.…”

unclassified

Effects of the Slovak Science Parks and Research Centers

Balog¹

2019

PPFAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstraktTechnology gap of the Slovak public R&D organizations hinder overall scientific as well as business capability. In order to reduce structural barriers, several supporting mechanisms were implemented during 2007-2013 programming period. Crucial approach supported key institutional innovation in last decades within public R&D environment. In total, 14 projects were supported to build a comprehensive R&D infrastructure. The science parks and research centers were built with the aim to enhance interaction of public R&D organizations with the real economy and foster technology transfer. They have contributed to overall scientific activity, enhance cooperation with variety of innovation actors as well as create technology transfer mechanisms. Nevertheless, overall effects are still suboptimal due to ban on revenue generation as well as absence of complementary funding. Kľúčové slováEfects, reseach, development, infrastructure, science park, research center. I. ÚvodVedecké parky predstavujú jednu zo zásadných inštitucionálnych inovácií v oblasti výskumu a vývoja (VaV), ktorá prispela k vyššej miere komercionalizácie výsledkov VaV realizovaného v prostredí verejných VaV organizácií. Vedecké parky možno definovať ako nástroje transferu technológií pre modernizáciu (často regionálnych) výrobných systémov. Vedecké parky predstavujú lokality, ktoré zabezpečujú správu nehnuteľností a vytvárajú možnosti na prenos myšlienok a poznatkov medzi priemyslom a akademickou obcou (Hansson, 2005). Vedecké a technologické parky zohrávajú významnú úlohu v ekonomickom rozvoji, pričom sú dôležitý faktor v konkurencieschopnosti hospodárstva (Guadix, 2016).Podľa UNESCO tento pojem zahŕňa akýkoľvek technologický klaster ako sú: technopolis, vedecký park, science city, cyber park, hi tech (priemyselný) park, inovačné centrum, VaV park, univerzitný výskumný park (UVP), výskumný technologický park, vedecký a technologický park (VTP), science town, technologický park, technologický inkubátor, technopark, technopolis a technologický biznis inkubátor. UVP a VTP patria medzi najčastejšie zmieňované odnože komplexných VaV infraštruktúr. V súčasnosti však neexistuje jednotná definícia. V princípe uskutočňujú činnosti v oblasti správy nehnuteľností, poskytujú služby týkajúce sa transferu technológií a podporujú partnerstvá medzi akademickými inštitúciami, vládou a súkromným sektorom (Link, 2003). Ich cieľom je podporovať ekonomický rozvoj a transfer technológií z akademického prostredia do praxe. Poskytované služby majú rôzny charakter a závisia od typu parku (EC, 2014).

show abstract

Success variables in science and technology parks

Cited by 74 publications

References 11 publications

Science Parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship

Science Parks and talent attraction management: university students as a strategic resource for innovation and entrepreneurship

From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‐organization in Zhongguancun, China

Effects of the Slovak Science Parks and Research Centers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About