2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0586-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful cuing of gender source memory does not improve location source memory

Abstract: In three experiments we explored crossdimensional cuing effects in a multidimensional source encoding and retrieval paradigm. We employed a biascontrolled experimental method of source cuing at retrieval (Starns & Hicks, 2013) in an attempt to improve retrieval of location information indirectly by cuing gender information. Encoded words were situated on the left or right side of a computer monitor and associated with either a male or a female face. When multiple faces were used across the set of encoded words… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our hypothesis that younger adults are more effective at selectively attending to the appropriate context than older adults, this would be the expected outcome. It is worth noting that the mechanisms underlying hyper-binding and conditional dependence in general are still under investigation, and previous studies suggest that context information may be bound to the item and not to each other (Hicks & Starns, 2016; Starns & Hicks, 2008; Vogt & Broder, 2007). The present results are consistent with the idea that irrelevant contextual features affected the manner in which events were encoded by older adults, although the exact manner remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our hypothesis that younger adults are more effective at selectively attending to the appropriate context than older adults, this would be the expected outcome. It is worth noting that the mechanisms underlying hyper-binding and conditional dependence in general are still under investigation, and previous studies suggest that context information may be bound to the item and not to each other (Hicks & Starns, 2016; Starns & Hicks, 2008; Vogt & Broder, 2007). The present results are consistent with the idea that irrelevant contextual features affected the manner in which events were encoded by older adults, although the exact manner remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutual cuing hypothesis (Meiser & Bröder, 2002) argues that successfully retrieving one context feature serves as cue for the other context feature if both have been encoded into the same memory trace. However, experimentally reinstating one context dimension during test (as a means to boost retrieval of this feature) did not lead to better remembering of the other feature in several experiments (Hicks & Starns, 2015, 2016Starns & Hicks, 2005Vogt & Bröder, 2007). Additionally, stochastic dependency between two features has also been shown when both features were tested in separate test phases, speaking against mutual cuing during retrieval (Starns & Hicks, 2005).…”
Section: Explanations Of Stochastic Dependence In Context Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the mutual cuing hypothesis does not necessarily predict that item and features are bound into a unitary representation. There is an ongoing debate regarding the two accounts, with some results supporting mutual cuing ( Boywitt & Meiser, 2012a , 2012b ; Meiser & Bröder, 2002 ; see also Balaban et al, 2019 ) and others supporting binding variability ( Hicks & Starns, 2016 ; Starns & Hicks, 2005 , 2008 ; Vogt & Bröder, 2007 ). There is some evidence against an integrated binding structure in item-based representations as investigated in the source memory literature ( Brady et al, 2013 ; Utochkin & Brady, 2020 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%