2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01782-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, rPCI has shown to reduce occupational hazards and minimize radiation exposure for the interventionalists [ 9 ], while these results were conflicting regarding patients’ exposure [ 17 , 18 ]. In the current study, the dose area product was lower compared to other rPCI cohorts [ 11 , 19 , 20 ], although procedural and fluoroscopy times were in a similar range in the majority of cases [ 11 , 19 ]. In our opinion, these findings cannot be explained by the use of the robotic platform itself rather than a strong focus on radiation protection at our institution as published before [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, rPCI has shown to reduce occupational hazards and minimize radiation exposure for the interventionalists [ 9 ], while these results were conflicting regarding patients’ exposure [ 17 , 18 ]. In the current study, the dose area product was lower compared to other rPCI cohorts [ 11 , 19 , 20 ], although procedural and fluoroscopy times were in a similar range in the majority of cases [ 11 , 19 ]. In our opinion, these findings cannot be explained by the use of the robotic platform itself rather than a strong focus on radiation protection at our institution as published before [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…At present, the second generation of CorPath is available. The CorPath GRX system (Figure 6 ) has new features that further facilitate R-PCI in complex anatomies, including remote manipulation of the guide catheter to help augment support after engagement or incorporation of wiring algorithms such as “rotate on retract and simplified device exchanges.” The new system achieves tremendous reduction in radiation exposure to operators with high rates of clinical and technical success even in complex PCI scenarios such as laser atherectomy or left main stem disease[ 31 , 34 , 35 ]. The R-One (Robocath) is a new R-PCI platform that recently received regulatory approval for use in Europe.…”
Section: Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of tactile feedback is another important issue in complex PCIs, where the interaction among the wire, lesion, and operator is key to subsequent technical success[ 40 ]. Finally, at least one team member needs to remain at the bedside for equipment exchanges and the procedure duration is significantly increased compared to traditional interventions[ 32 , 35 , 42 ].…”
Section: Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R-PCI allows operators to manipulate PCI devices remotely sitting at a cockpit located several meters away from the patient, and in addition, the assistant can be at the foot of the bed much further from the access site. The details of the CorPath GRX system were described elsewhere [ 25 , 26 ] . Briefly, the CorPath GRX system consists of an interventional cockpit and a bedside unit ( Fig.…”
Section: Covid-19 and Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%