1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb55753.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful Prenatal Diagnosis from Maternal Blood with Magnetic‐Activated Cell Sorting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to solve the first problem, many groups are currently working on techniques to enrich for NRBCs through flow-sorting and/or magnetic sorting and subsequent PCR-or FISH-analysis (1,7,14,19). However, enrichment procedures inevitably lead to cell loss (1,6,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve the first problem, many groups are currently working on techniques to enrich for NRBCs through flow-sorting and/or magnetic sorting and subsequent PCR-or FISH-analysis (1,7,14,19). However, enrichment procedures inevitably lead to cell loss (1,6,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the NRBCs up to 180 hours in stored samples highlighted the effectiveness of choosing fetal erythroblasts as the ideal candidates for noninvasive diagnosis. 13 In 5 cases, we were able to isolate Most of the PCR defined methods reported earlier were restricted in their application only to sex-linked disorders and to pregnancies with male fetuses. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis could be used to its maximum if fetal cells from the maternal circulation are used for genetic analysis of autosomal disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This difference may well be due to differences in target cells, in type and technique of invasive procedure (amniocentesis, transabdominal CVS, or transcervical CVS), and in methodology. Ganshirt et al (19), for instance, did not sample preand postinvasively in the same pregnancy, but only compared different groups. FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%