2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2989503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successive Decode-and-Forward Relaying With Privacy-Aware Interference Suppression

Abstract: Successive relaying holds the promise of achieving spatial diversity gain for single-antenna users while recovering the multiplexing loss due to the half-duplex relaying in B5G/6G. However, how to mitigate inter-relay interference (IRI) with privacy protection in low complexity remains open. In this paper, we present a successive decode-and-forward (DF) relaying protocol based on an analog network interference cancellation (NICE) method, which may suppress IRI, using linear processing without decoding the sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research shows that SR technology can recover the multiplexing loss of HD relay network while ensuring the diversity gain [14]. However, in the SR system, the relay in the transmitting state will cause interference to the relay in the receiving state, which is called inter-relay interference (IRI) [13,15]. The work in [13] propose a SR based cooperative NOMA (SR−NOMA) system which employs amplify-and-forward (AF) relays instead of DF relays for more flexible in handling the IRI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows that SR technology can recover the multiplexing loss of HD relay network while ensuring the diversity gain [14]. However, in the SR system, the relay in the transmitting state will cause interference to the relay in the receiving state, which is called inter-relay interference (IRI) [13,15]. The work in [13] propose a SR based cooperative NOMA (SR−NOMA) system which employs amplify-and-forward (AF) relays instead of DF relays for more flexible in handling the IRI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve this issue, many self-interference-mitigation methods have been studied [21], [25], [26], [31], [32]. By contrast, because there is no self-interference between retransmitted and received signals at the half-duplex RN, it can be readily implemented and has been actively studied [1], [13], [16], [18]- [20], [22], [24], [27], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, second-hop channel state information (CSI) is required at the RN, which would burden the cooperative networks. By contrast, the D&F RN requires more computational capability and consumes relatively more power compared to the A&F RN, and the incorrectly decoded message signals interfere with the message recovery at the DN [13], [15], [16], [19], [22]. To reduce the decoding complexity at the D&F RN, a preprocessingand-forward (PF)-type RN that detects the message symbols and processes them at the symbol level before the retransmission with less computational complexity has been proposed [20], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the interference cancellation (IC) is required at relay to avoid performance degradation. Wei et al [9] caused relays to actively store the source signals as priori knowledges to cancel IRI. Marey and Moustafa [10] separated the transmission from source and forwarding relay using carriers with the same frequency but in phase quadrature to achieve IRI-free.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%