Sugar Beet Fertilization

Hergert, Gary W.

doi:10.1007/s12355-010-0037-1

Cited by 40 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three days later, bed tops were removed and sugarbeet was planted in a row centered atop each bed. The conventional N treatment was applied as a split application after stand establishment to enhance N use efficiency and N uptake (Carter and Traveller, 1981; Hergert, 2010). To the conventionally fertilized plots only, 56 kg N ha −1 (as urea) was broadcast on 5 May 2003, followed by a sidedress application of 67 kg N ha −1 (as urea) on 4 June and a second of 78 kg N ha −1 (as urea) on 17 June.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compost and Manure Effects on Sugarbeet Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Recovery, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To maximize recoverable sucrose from sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.), producers must e ectively manage added N, be it from urea or organic sources such as manure or composted manure. Our study's objective was to determine the e ects of a one-time application of stockpiled and composted dairy cattle (Bos taurus) manure on sugarbeet N uptake, nitrogen recovery (NR) and nitrogen use e ciency (NUE). First-year Site A treatments included a control (no N), urea (202 kg N ha -1 ), compost (218 and 435 kg estimated available N ha -1 ), and manure (140 and 280 kg available N ha -1 ). Site B treatments were a control, urea (82 kg N ha -1 ), compost (81 and 183 kg available N ha -1 ), and manure (173 and 340 kg available N ha -1 ). Compost and manure were incorporated into two silt loams, a Greenleaf ( ne-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Xeric Calciargid) near Parma, ID, in fall 2002 and 2003 and a Portneuf (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Durinodic Xeric Haplocalcid) near Kimberly, ID, in fall 2002 with sugarbeet planted the following spring. At each site, N uptake of sugarbeet tops, but not roots, was similar whether fertilized with urea or organic N, regardless of rate. Incorporating equal organic amendment rates to 0.05 rather than 0.10 m increased whole-plant N uptake 1.13-fold, to 163.3 kg N ha -1 . In general, NR varied among fertilizer sources such that urea >> manure > compost. Where similar available N rates were supplied, NUE ranged from 44.1 to 83.5 kg sucrose kg -1 available N, not di ering among inorganic and organic N sources within site-years.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Compost and Manure Effects on Sugarbeet Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Recovery, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sugar beet is the main sugar producing crop in the Europe, and since it has been grown in the wide range of environmental conditions, successful management and production of the crop often represent a challenge for breeders and farmers (Jaggard et al, 2007; Hergert, 2010). Choosing the sugar beet hybrid with high yield potential is important as well as good adapted agronomic measures and practices, synchronized with requirements and needs of the plant (ulaković et al., 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Sugar Beet Genotype, Planting and Harvesting Dates and Their Interaction on Sugar Yield

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate changes are affecting the plant production, including sugar beet growing especially in the southern and central parts of the Europe. Modifying the sowing and harvesting dates are one of the most often used adaptations in sugar beet cultivation. The aim of this study was to assess the interactions between planting date and sugar beet genotypes for different harvest dates with recommendation for duration of vegetation period for specific hybrids in order to achieve the best performance and to evaluate influence of climatic factors on sugar yield. Three-way analysis of variance and AMMI (Additive main effect and multiple interactions) analysis were performed to investigate interaction between main factors. Analysis of variance revealed that genotypes (G), planting date (PD), harvest date (HD) and interaction G × PD significantly affected sugar yield in 2016. In 2017 genotypes, planting date, harvest date and G x PD interaction significantly affected sugar yield on probability level of 1%, while PD × HD interaction had significant effect on probability level of 5%. Results of AMMI analysis enabled discrimination of genotypes with the highest level of stability in certain planting dates. Hybrids with combined yield and sugar content (NZ type) should have the advantage in earlier planting dates compared to of sugar beet hybrids with higher sugar content (Z type). However, in shortened vegetation period Z type hybrids are more stable and with better sugar yield results. Results of our study suggest that delaying the harvest date decreases differences between sugar yields obtained from hybrids sown in different planting dates. Major factors in the study affecting sugar yield were growing degree days, insolation and number of days from planting to harvest.

show abstract

“…Las exigencias nutricionales de la remolacha azucarera son elevadas, es decir, la fertilización debe considerar el ciclo vegetativo de crecimiento largo, para optimizar el nitrógeno (Marchetti y Castelli, 2011). Esto implica, disponer de nutrientes con asimilación rápida de acción prolongada y persistente (Hergert, 2010); además, del análisis de suelo previo al establecimiento del cultivo para def inir la dosis de fertilización. El balance nutricional de la planta tiene efecto en la producción de biomasa y sacarosa; además entre estas variables no existe una correlación (Tsialtas y Maslaris, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Fertilización inorgánica en remolacha azucarera (Beta vulgaris L.) en el norte de Tamaulipas

García

López

Franco

et al. 2019

Terra

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a source of sugars. In Mexico, trials have been carried out to evaluate adaptation of the crop as a potential source of biomass, sugar and ethanol. Fertilization is a factor that influences production. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of inorganic fertilization on yield and production of soluble solids under irrigation conditions. An irrigation field experiment was established on February 25, 2010 and March 3, 2011, in Río Bravo, Tamaulipas (INIFAP-CIRNE). The variety used was EBO-809 Type N (Normalreich: moderately rich in sugar), with 13 doses of (N‑P) from 150-00-00 to 300-200-00, and the control without fertilization. Urea was the source of (N) and triple superphosphate of (P). Fresh weight (Mg ha-1), chlorophyll index (SPAD), soluble solids (oBrix) and incidence of root rot (%) were evaluated. The factor with the highest statistical value was the fertilization dose (T), explaining 70% of the variance 24% the year (A), and there was no interaction (T × A). Root rot was attributable by Rhizoctonia solani (Kühn), which is negatively associated with yield, due to atypical winter rainfall in 2010. There were no differences between treatments with N-P fertilization. The critical value of N was superior to the control and ≤ to 150 kg ha-1. The concentration of sugars was not related to yield, SPAD or R. solani incidence; moreover, it was inversely proportional to the nitrogen dose.

show abstract

Sugar Beet Fertilization

Cited by 40 publications

References 54 publications

Compost and Manure Effects on Sugarbeet Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Recovery, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Compost and Manure Effects on Sugarbeet Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Recovery, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Effect of Sugar Beet Genotype, Planting and Harvesting Dates and Their Interaction on Sugar Yield

Fertilización inorgánica en remolacha azucarera (Beta vulgaris L.) en el norte de Tamaulipas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About