2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in Children: The Interplay of Household SNAP and WIC Participation

Abstract: Introduction: Although sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is associated with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation, no national studies have examined the interplay between these programs. This study compares children's sugar-sweetened beverage consumption across households enrolled in one, both, or neither program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates nutrition assistance program participation is associated with improved food security, dietary quality, and health among children (Clark & Fox, 2009; Gundersen et al, 2012, 2017; Kreider et al, 2016). An emerging literature further indicates nutrition assistance programs are complementary in nature, with participation in multiple programs resulting in greater food security and dietary quality improvement than participation in a single program (Acciai et al, 2021; Jensen et al, 2019; Laurito & Schwartz, 2019; Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates nutrition assistance program participation is associated with improved food security, dietary quality, and health among children (Clark & Fox, 2009; Gundersen et al, 2012, 2017; Kreider et al, 2016). An emerging literature further indicates nutrition assistance programs are complementary in nature, with participation in multiple programs resulting in greater food security and dietary quality improvement than participation in a single program (Acciai et al, 2021; Jensen et al, 2019; Laurito & Schwartz, 2019; Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some evidence suggests that federally funded programs designed to address food security, a variable examined here, have differential effects on SSB consumption among children. In one study using multiple waves of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits were associated with greater SSB consumption, but the benefits from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) were not [ 22 ]. Parental nativity as a proxy for immigration, another variable examined here, may also be important, for multiple reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WIC has also been associated with lower rates of early introduction of cow’s milk during infancy [ 56 ] and increased intake of important nutrients, including iron, potassium, and fiber [ 57 ]. WIC participation, alone or jointly with SNAP, is also associated with lower sugar-sweetened beverage consumption [ 58 ]. Although numerous studies indicate that WIC participation during pregnancy is associated with better birth outcomes [ 53 , 56 , 59 , 60 ], little existing research has examined the benefits of WIC participation on child diet and nutrition that extend beyond the newborn period [ 61 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, participating in WIC and SNAP jointly or alone was associated with better nutritional health outcomes, including reduced risk of anemia, failure to thrive, and nutritional deficiency [ 68 ]. Household WIC participation—whether jointly with SNAP or alone—may help reduce consumption of sugar sweetened beverages [ 58 ]. Because the research on the protective effects of dual enrollment in WIC and SNAP on child FV and SFAS consumption across levels of poverty is limited, it is unclear whether enrollment in both programs provides additive protective benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation